qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[PULL 01/53] numa: hmat: fix cache size check


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: [PULL 01/53] numa: hmat: fix cache size check
Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:20:30 -0400

From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

when QEMU is started like:

qemu-system-x86_64 -smp 2 -machine hmat=on \
 -m 2G \
 -object memory-backend-ram,size=1G,id=m0 \
 -object memory-backend-ram,size=1G,id=m1 \
 -numa node,nodeid=0,memdev=m0 \
 -numa node,nodeid=1,memdev=m1,initiator=0 \
 -numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=0 \
 -numa cpu,node-id=0,socket-id=1 \
 -numa 
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=5
 \
 -numa 
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=0,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=200M
 \
 -numa 
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-latency,latency=10
 \
 -numa 
hmat-lb,initiator=0,target=1,hierarchy=memory,data-type=access-bandwidth,bandwidth=100M
 \
 -numa 
hmat-cache,node-id=0,size=8K,level=1,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=5
 \
 -numa 
hmat-cache,node-id=0,size=16K,level=2,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=5

it errors out with:
 -numa 
hmat-cache,node-id=0,size=16K,level=2,associativity=direct,policy=write-back,line=5:
        Invalid size=16384, the size of level=2 should be less than the 
size(8192) of level=1

which doesn't look right as one would expect that L1 < L2 < L3 ...
Fix it by sawpping relevant size checks.

Fixes: c412a48d4d91 (numa: Extend CLI to provide memory side cache information)
Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <20200821100519.1325691-1-imammedo@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
---
 hw/core/numa.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/core/numa.c b/hw/core/numa.c
index d1a94a14f8..f9593ec716 100644
--- a/hw/core/numa.c
+++ b/hw/core/numa.c
@@ -425,10 +425,10 @@ void parse_numa_hmat_cache(MachineState *ms, 
NumaHmatCacheOptions *node,
 
     if ((node->level > 1) &&
         ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id][node->level - 1] &&
-        (node->size >=
+        (node->size <=
             ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id][node->level - 1]->size)) 
{
         error_setg(errp, "Invalid size=%" PRIu64 ", the size of level=%" PRIu8
-                   " should be less than the size(%" PRIu64 ") of "
+                   " should be larger than the size(%" PRIu64 ") of "
                    "level=%u", node->size, node->level,
                    ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id]
                                              [node->level - 1]->size,
@@ -438,10 +438,10 @@ void parse_numa_hmat_cache(MachineState *ms, 
NumaHmatCacheOptions *node,
 
     if ((node->level < HMAT_LB_LEVELS - 1) &&
         ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id][node->level + 1] &&
-        (node->size <=
+        (node->size >=
             ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id][node->level + 1]->size)) 
{
         error_setg(errp, "Invalid size=%" PRIu64 ", the size of level=%" PRIu8
-                   " should be larger than the size(%" PRIu64 ") of "
+                   " should be less than the size(%" PRIu64 ") of "
                    "level=%u", node->size, node->level,
                    ms->numa_state->hmat_cache[node->node_id]
                                              [node->level + 1]->size,
-- 
2.26.2




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]