qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] migration/dirtyrate: Compare page hash results for


From: Zheng Chuan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/12] migration/dirtyrate: Compare page hash results for recorded sampled page
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2020 19:10:31 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0


On 2020/8/31 17:10, David Edmondson wrote:
> On Saturday, 2020-08-29 at 10:52:52 +08, Chuan Zheng wrote:
> 
>> Compare page hash results for recorded sampled page.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chuan Zheng <zhengchuan@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: YanYing Zhuang <ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  migration/dirtyrate.c | 63 
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/migration/dirtyrate.c b/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> index f4967fd..9cc2cbb 100644
>> --- a/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> +++ b/migration/dirtyrate.c
>> @@ -193,6 +193,69 @@ static int record_ramblock_hash_info(struct 
>> RamblockDirtyInfo **block_dinfo,
>>      return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>> +static void calc_page_dirty_rate(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info)
>> +{
>> +    uint32_t crc;
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < info->sample_pages_count; i++) {
>> +        crc = get_ramblock_vfn_hash(info, info->sample_page_vfn[i]);
>> +        if (crc != info->hash_result[i]) {
>> +            info->sample_dirty_count++;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct RamblockDirtyInfo *
>> +find_page_matched(RAMBlock *block, int count,
>> +                  struct RamblockDirtyInfo *infos)
>> +{
>> +    int i;
>> +    struct RamblockDirtyInfo *matched;
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
>> +        if (!strcmp(infos[i].idstr, qemu_ram_get_idstr(block))) {
>> +            break;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (i == count) {
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (infos[i].ramblock_addr != qemu_ram_get_host_addr(block) ||
>> +        infos[i].ramblock_pages !=
>> +            (qemu_ram_get_used_length(block) >> TARGET_PAGE_BITS)) {
>> +        return NULL;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    matched = &infos[i];
>> +
>> +    return matched;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int compare_page_hash_info(struct RamblockDirtyInfo *info,
>> +                                  int block_index)
>> +{
>> +    struct RamblockDirtyInfo *block_dinfo = NULL;
>> +    RAMBlock *block = NULL;
>> +
>> +    RAMBLOCK_FOREACH_MIGRATABLE(block) {
>> +        block_dinfo = find_page_matched(block, block_index + 1, info);
>> +        if (block_dinfo == NULL) {
>> +            continue;
>> +        }
>> +        calc_page_dirty_rate(block_dinfo);
>> +        update_dirtyrate_stat(block_dinfo);
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    if (!DirtyStat.total_sample_count) {
> 
> total_sample_count isn't a boolean or pointer - comparing against 0
> would be clearer.
> OK, will fix it in V7

>> +        return -1;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static void calculate_dirtyrate(struct DirtyRateConfig config)
>>  {
>>      /* todo */
>> -- 
>> 1.8.3.1
> 
> dme.
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]