[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] monitor: Optionally run handlers in coroutines
From: |
Kevin Wolf |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] monitor: Optionally run handlers in coroutines |
Date: |
Thu, 3 Sep 2020 14:45:29 +0200 |
Am 03.09.2020 um 12:49 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>
> > Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
> >
> >> I let this series slide to get my Error API rework done, along with much
> >> else. My sincere apologies!
> >>
> >> Unsurprisingly, it needs a rebase now. I suggest to let me review it as
> >> is first.
> >
> > I'm done with v6. Summary:
> >
> > * A few trivial things to correct here and there.
> >
> > * A few ideas to improve things in relatively minor ways.
> >
> > * PATCH 03 looks "why bother" to me until PATCH 09 makes me suspect you
> > did the former to enable the latter. If you had captured that in your
> > commit message back then, like you did for the similar PATCH 05, I
> > wouldn't be scratching my head now :)
> >
> > * I dislike PATCH 06, and would like to explore an alternative idea.
> >
> > * PATCH 08 makes hairy monitor code even hairier, but I don't have
> > better ideas.
> >
> > * I don't feel comfortable as a sole reviewer of the AIO magic in PATCH
> > 10-12. Let's ask Stefan for an eye-over.
> >
> > I'd like to proceed as follows. You rebase, and address "easy" review
> > comments (you decide what's easy). Post as v7, cc'ing Stefan for the
> > AIO magic and David Gilbert for HMP. While they review (hopefully), I
> > explore a replacement for PATCH 06. And then we touch bases and decide
> > how to get this thing wrapped.
>
> I explored:
>
> Subject: Ways to do per-coroutine properties (was: [PATCH v6 06/12]
> monitor: Make current monitor a per-coroutine property)
> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2020 15:09:19 +0200 (3 weeks, 5 days, 21 hours ago)
> Message-ID: <87a6z6wqkg.fsf_-_@dusky.pond.sub.org>
>
> May I have v7? Feel free to keep your PATCH 06. If I decide to replace
> it, I can do it myself, possibly on top.
It's one of the next things on my list. I can't promise anything more
specific, though.
Kevin