[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH] travis.yml: Drop the default softmmu builds
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH] travis.yml: Drop the default softmmu builds |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 14:22:41 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.5; emacs 28.0.50 |
Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:
> On 05/09/2020 14.15, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 05/08/2020 20.54, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> The total runtime of all Travis jobs is very long and we are testing
>>> all softmmu targets in the gitlab-CI already - so we can speed up the
>>> Travis testing a little bit by not testing the softmmu targets here
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> Well, ok, we do not test all the softmmu targets on gitlab-CI with
>>> that same ancient version of Ubuntu ... but do we still care about
>>> testing all softmmut targets on Ubuntu Xenial at all? ... at least
>>> according to our support policy, we do not care about Xenial anymore.
>>>
>>> .travis.yml | 14 --------------
>>> 1 file changed, 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/.travis.yml b/.travis.yml
>>> index 6695c0620f..18290bc51d 100644
>>> --- a/.travis.yml
>>> +++ b/.travis.yml
>>> @@ -123,20 +123,6 @@ jobs:
>>> - CONFIG="--disable-system --static"
>>> - CACHE_NAME="${TRAVIS_BRANCH}-linux-gcc-default"
>>>
>>> -
>>> - # we split the system builds as it takes a while to build them all
>>> - - name: "GCC (main-softmmu)"
>>> - env:
>>> - - CONFIG="--disable-user --target-list=${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS}"
>>> - - CACHE_NAME="${TRAVIS_BRANCH}-linux-gcc-default"
>>> -
>>> -
>>> - - name: "GCC (other-softmmu)"
>>> - env:
>>> - - CONFIG="--disable-user
>>> --target-list-exclude=${MAIN_SOFTMMU_TARGETS}"
>>> - - CACHE_NAME="${TRAVIS_BRANCH}-linux-gcc-default"
>>> -
>>> -
>>> # Just build tools and run minimal unit and softfloat checks
>>> - name: "GCC check-softfloat (user)"
>>> env:
>>>
>>
>> Ping?
>
> Ping^2 ... Alex, Philippe, any opinions on this patch?
I'm agnostic on this. Is it worth slightly reducing our coverage for ~50
minutes of runtime out of 10 hours? I guess it would be a bit greener.
Acked-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
--
Alex Bennée