[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Hint notifier is not NULL in as_translate_f
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] softmmu/physmem: Hint notifier is not NULL in as_translate_for_iotlb() |
Date: |
Sun, 17 Jan 2021 16:47:35 +0000 |
On Sun, 17 Jan 2021 at 16:07, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
>
> When using GCC 10.2 configured with --extra-cflags=-Os, we get:
>
> softmmu/physmem.c: In function ‘address_space_translate_for_iotlb’:
> softmmu/physmem.c:643:26: error: ‘notifier’ may be used uninitialized in
> this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> 643 | notifier->active = true;
> | ^
> softmmu/physmem.c:608:23: note: ‘notifier’ was declared here
> 608 | TCGIOMMUNotifier *notifier;
> | ^~~~~~~~
>
> Insert assertions as hint to the compiler that 'notifier' can
> not be NULL there.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> ---
> Yet another hole in our CI.
> ---
> softmmu/physmem.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/softmmu/physmem.c b/softmmu/physmem.c
> index 6301f4f0a5c..65602ed548e 100644
> --- a/softmmu/physmem.c
> +++ b/softmmu/physmem.c
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static void tcg_register_iommu_notifier(CPUState *cpu,
> * when the IOMMU tells us the mappings we've cached have changed.
> */
> MemoryRegion *mr = MEMORY_REGION(iommu_mr);
> - TCGIOMMUNotifier *notifier;
> + TCGIOMMUNotifier *notifier = NULL;
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < cpu->iommu_notifiers->len; i++) {
> @@ -638,6 +638,7 @@ static void tcg_register_iommu_notifier(CPUState *cpu,
> memory_region_register_iommu_notifier(notifier->mr, ¬ifier->n,
> &error_fatal);
> }
> + assert(notifier != NULL);
>
> if (!notifier->active) {
> notifier->active = true;
Is the assert() necessary to prevent the compiler complaining?
Usually we don't bother if it's about to be dereferenced anyway.
thanks
-- PMM