[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/3] 9pfs: Convert V9fsFidState::fid_list to QSIMPLEQ
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 2/3] 9pfs: Convert V9fsFidState::fid_list to QSIMPLEQ |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:31:26 +0100 |
On Montag, 18. Januar 2021 15:22:59 CET Greg Kurz wrote:
> The fid_list is currently open-coded. This doesn't seem to serve any
> purpose that cannot be met with QEMU's generic lists. Let's go for a
> QSIMPLEQ : this will allow to add new fids at the end of the list and
> to improve the logic in v9fs_mark_fids_unreclaim().
>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kurz <groug@kaod.org>
In general LGTM hence:
Reviewed-by: Christian Schoenebeck <qemu_oss@crudebyte.com>
Some comments below ...
> ---
> hw/9pfs/9p.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
> hw/9pfs/9p.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> index 37c3379b7462..b65f320e6518 100644
> --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
> @@ -260,7 +260,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *coroutine_fn get_fid(V9fsPDU *pdu,
> int32_t fid) V9fsFidState *f;
> V9fsState *s = pdu->s;
>
> - for (f = s->fid_list; f; f = f->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(f, &s->fid_list, next) {
> BUG_ON(f->clunked);
> if (f->fid == fid) {
> /*
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *alloc_fid(V9fsState *s, int32_t
> fid) {
> V9fsFidState *f;
>
> - for (f = s->fid_list; f; f = f->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(f, &s->fid_list, next) {
> /* If fid is already there return NULL */
> BUG_ON(f->clunked);
> if (f->fid == fid) {
> @@ -311,8 +311,7 @@ static V9fsFidState *alloc_fid(V9fsState *s, int32_t
> fid) * reclaim won't close the file descriptor
> */
> f->flags |= FID_REFERENCED;
> - f->next = s->fid_list;
> - s->fid_list = f;
> + QSIMPLEQ_INSERT_HEAD(&s->fid_list, f, next);
Not related to this series, but I wonder why queue.h wraps everything into:
do {
...
} while (0);
No comment about it in git history. Looks like a leftover of its initial
import from 2009.
> v9fs_readdir_init(s->proto_version, &f->fs.dir);
> v9fs_readdir_init(s->proto_version, &f->fs_reclaim.dir);
> @@ -401,20 +400,16 @@ static int coroutine_fn put_fid(V9fsPDU *pdu,
> V9fsFidState *fidp)
>
> static V9fsFidState *clunk_fid(V9fsState *s, int32_t fid)
> {
> - V9fsFidState **fidpp, *fidp;
> + V9fsFidState *fidp;
>
> - for (fidpp = &s->fid_list; *fidpp; fidpp = &(*fidpp)->next) {
> - if ((*fidpp)->fid == fid) {
> - break;
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(fidp, &s->fid_list, next) {
> + if (fidp->fid == fid) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE(&s->fid_list, fidp, V9fsFidState, next);
> + fidp->clunked = true;
> + return fidp;
> }
> }
> - if (*fidpp == NULL) {
> - return NULL;
> - }
> - fidp = *fidpp;
> - *fidpp = fidp->next;
> - fidp->clunked = true;
> - return fidp;
> + return NULL;
> }
Good cleanup there!
> void coroutine_fn v9fs_reclaim_fd(V9fsPDU *pdu)
> @@ -423,7 +418,7 @@ void coroutine_fn v9fs_reclaim_fd(V9fsPDU *pdu)
> V9fsState *s = pdu->s;
> V9fsFidState *f, *reclaim_list = NULL;
>
> - for (f = s->fid_list; f; f = f->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(f, &s->fid_list, next) {
> /*
> * Unlink fids cannot be reclaimed. Check
> * for them and skip them. Also skip fids
> @@ -505,7 +500,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn v9fs_mark_fids_unreclaim(V9fsPDU
> *pdu, V9fsPath *path) V9fsFidState *fidp;
>
> again:
> - for (fidp = s->fid_list; fidp; fidp = fidp->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(fidp, &s->fid_list, next) {
> if (fidp->path.size != path->size) {
> continue;
> }
> @@ -537,13 +532,13 @@ static void coroutine_fn virtfs_reset(V9fsPDU *pdu)
> V9fsFidState *fidp;
>
> /* Free all fids */
> - while (s->fid_list) {
> + while (!QSIMPLEQ_EMPTY(&s->fid_list)) {
> /* Get fid */
> - fidp = s->fid_list;
> + fidp = QSIMPLEQ_FIRST(&s->fid_list);
> fidp->ref++;
>
> /* Clunk fid */
> - s->fid_list = fidp->next;
> + QSIMPLEQ_REMOVE(&s->fid_list, fidp, V9fsFidState, next);
> fidp->clunked = true;
>
> put_fid(pdu, fidp);
> @@ -3121,7 +3116,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn v9fs_complete_rename(V9fsPDU
> *pdu, V9fsFidState *fidp, * Fixup fid's pointing to the old name to
> * start pointing to the new name
> */
> - for (tfidp = s->fid_list; tfidp; tfidp = tfidp->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(tfidp, &s->fid_list, next) {
> if (v9fs_path_is_ancestor(&fidp->path, &tfidp->path)) {
> /* replace the name */
> v9fs_fix_path(&tfidp->path, &new_path,
> strlen(fidp->path.data)); @@ -3215,7 +3210,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> v9fs_fix_fid_paths(V9fsPDU *pdu, V9fsPath *olddir, * Fixup fid's pointing
> to the old name to
> * start pointing to the new name
> */
> - for (tfidp = s->fid_list; tfidp; tfidp = tfidp->next) {
> + QSIMPLEQ_FOREACH(tfidp, &s->fid_list, next) {
> if (v9fs_path_is_ancestor(&oldpath, &tfidp->path)) {
> /* replace the name */
> v9fs_fix_path(&tfidp->path, &newpath, strlen(oldpath.data));
> @@ -4081,7 +4076,7 @@ int v9fs_device_realize_common(V9fsState *s, const
> V9fsTransport *t, s->ctx.fmode = fse->fmode;
> s->ctx.dmode = fse->dmode;
>
> - s->fid_list = NULL;
> + QSIMPLEQ_INIT(&s->fid_list);
> qemu_co_rwlock_init(&s->rename_lock);
>
> if (s->ops->init(&s->ctx, errp) < 0) {
> diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.h b/hw/9pfs/9p.h
> index 93656323d1d7..85fb6930b0ca 100644
> --- a/hw/9pfs/9p.h
> +++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.h
> @@ -280,7 +280,7 @@ struct V9fsFidState {
> uid_t uid;
> int ref;
> bool clunked;
> - V9fsFidState *next;
> + QSIMPLEQ_ENTRY(V9fsFidState) next;
> V9fsFidState *rclm_lst;
> };
Is there a reason for not migrating 'rclm_lst' as well?
Anyway, if you decide to do that as well, then it would IMO be fine with a
separate patch later on, not worth making it more complicated with a v2 just
for that.
> @@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ typedef struct {
> struct V9fsState {
> QLIST_HEAD(, V9fsPDU) free_list;
> QLIST_HEAD(, V9fsPDU) active_list;
> - V9fsFidState *fid_list;
> + QSIMPLEQ_HEAD(, V9fsFidState) fid_list;
Not an issue for this series, but I wonder whether that macro's first argument
shouldn't simply be dropped in queue.h, because there are only 2 occurences in
the entire QEMU code base using it. It looks like nobody really needs it.
> FileOperations *ops;
> FsContext ctx;
> char *tag;
Best regards,
Christian Schoenebeck
Re: [PATCH 0/3] 9pfs: Improve unreclaim logic, Greg Kurz, 2021/01/21