qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] qapi/gen: Combine ._add_[user|system]_module


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 10/17] qapi/gen: Combine ._add_[user|system]_module
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 11:10:52 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0

On 1/20/21 9:20 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com> writes:

From: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

QAPISchemaModularCVisitor attempts to encapsulate the way it splits
the module name space between user modules (name can't start with
'./') and system modules (name is None or starts with './') by

Is this still accurate?


Ah, not exactly; sorry I mangled your patches here. I had written my own version of what this patch used to be, but your patch went one step further, but the ordering got weird.

providing separate ._add_user_module() and ._add_system_module(),
where the latter prepends './' to names other than None.

Not worthwhile.  Dumb down to a single ._add_module().

Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
---
  scripts/qapi/commands.py |  2 +-
  scripts/qapi/events.py   |  2 +-
  scripts/qapi/gen.py      | 20 +++++++-------------
  3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/qapi/commands.py b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
index fc5fe27c472..49111663394 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/commands.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/commands.py
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ def _begin_user_module(self, name: str) -> None:
                               types=types))
def visit_end(self) -> None:
-        self._add_system_module('./init', ' * QAPI Commands initialization')
+        self._add_module('./init', ' * QAPI Commands initialization')
          self._genh.add(mcgen('''
  #include "qapi/qmp/dispatch.h"
diff --git a/scripts/qapi/events.py b/scripts/qapi/events.py
index 26faa829898..079c666ec69 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/events.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/events.py
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ def _begin_user_module(self, name: str) -> None:
                               types=types))
def visit_end(self) -> None:
-        self._add_system_module('./emit', ' * QAPI Events emission')
+        self._add_module('./emit', ' * QAPI Events emission')
          self._genc.preamble_add(mcgen('''
  #include "qemu/osdep.h"
  #include "%(prefix)sqapi-emit-events.h"
diff --git a/scripts/qapi/gen.py b/scripts/qapi/gen.py
index 55acd7e080d..b5505685e6e 100644
--- a/scripts/qapi/gen.py
+++ b/scripts/qapi/gen.py
@@ -272,22 +272,15 @@ def _module_filename(self, what: str, name: str) -> str:
                              self._module_basename(what, name))
def _add_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None:
+        if QAPISchemaModule.is_user_module(name):
+            if self._main_module is None:
+                self._main_module = name
          basename = self._module_filename(self._what, name)
          genc = QAPIGenC(basename + '.c', blurb, self._pydoc)
          genh = QAPIGenH(basename + '.h', blurb, self._pydoc)
          self._module[name] = (genc, genh)
          self._genc, self._genh = self._module[name]
- def _add_user_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None:
-        assert QAPISchemaModule.is_user_module(name)
-        if self._main_module is None:
-            self._main_module = name
-        self._add_module(name, blurb)
-
-    def _add_system_module(self, name: str, blurb: str) -> None:
-        assert QAPISchemaModule.is_system_module(name)
-        self._add_module(name, blurb)
-
      def write(self, output_dir: str, opt_builtins: bool = False) -> None:
          for name in self._module:
              if QAPISchemaModule.is_builtin_module(name) and not opt_builtins:
@@ -303,9 +296,9 @@ def _begin_user_module(self, name: str) -> None:
          pass
def visit_module(self, module: QAPISchemaModule) -> None:
-        if module.system_module:
+        if module.builtin_module:

Looks like you're fixing a slip-up in PATCH 06.  If yes, squash.  If no,
I'm confused.


Or patch 7, actually -- where we clarify that we are checking for the built-in module and not any old system module.

              if self._builtin_blurb:
-                self._add_system_module(module.name, self._builtin_blurb)
+                self._add_module(module.name, self._builtin_blurb)
                  self._begin_builtin_module()
              else:
                  # The built-in module has not been created.  No code may
@@ -313,7 +306,8 @@ def visit_module(self, module: QAPISchemaModule) -> None:
                  self._genc = None
                  self._genh = None
          else:
-            self._add_user_module(module.name, self._user_blurb)
+            assert module.user_module, "Unexpected system module"

The string provides no value.


That's just, like, your opinion, man. It has value to me.


Compare:

```
#!/usr/bin/env python3

def main():
    assert False

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()
```

```
# ./foo.py

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./foo.py", line 7, in <module>
    main()
  File "./foo.py", line 4, in main
    assert False
AssertionError
```

With:


```
#!/usr/bin/env python3

def main():
    assert False, "Unexpected system module"

if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()
```

```
# ./foo.py

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "./foo.py", line 7, in <module>
    main()
  File "./foo.py", line 4, in main
    assert False, "Unexpected system module"
AssertionError: Unexpected system module
```

I like the extra string for giving some semantic context as to specifically what broke (We don't expect to see system modules here) instead of just a stack trace.

+            self._add_module(module.name, self._user_blurb)
              self._begin_user_module(module.name)
def visit_include(self, name: str, info: QAPISourceInfo) -> None:




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]