[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Jan 2021 12:18:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 |
On 1/21/21 11:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:08:29AM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote:
>> On 10/01/2021 17.27, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> Split the current GCC build-tci job in 2, and use Clang
>>> compiler in the new job.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
>>> ---
>>> RFC in case someone have better idea to optimize can respin this patch.
>>>
>>> .gitlab-ci.yml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> I'm not quite sure whether we should go down this road ... if we wanted to
>> have full test coverage for clang, we'd need to duplicate *all* jobs to run
>> them once with gcc and once with clang. And that would be just overkill.
>>
>> I think we already catch most clang-related problems with the clang jobs
>> that we already have in our CI, so problems like the ones that you've tried
>> to address here should be very, very rare. So I'd rather vote for not
>> splitting the job here.
>
> We can't possibly cope with the fully expanded matrix of what are
> theoretically possible combinations. Thus I think we should be guided
> by what is expected real world usage by platforms we target.
>
> Essentially for any given distro we're testing on, our primary focus
> should be to use the toolchain that distro will build QEMU with.
>
> IOW, for Windows and Linux distros our primary focus should be GCC,
> while for macOS, and *BSD, our focus should be CLang.
Sounds good.
Do we need a TCI job on macOS then?
Thanks,
Phil.
- [PATCH 0/2] tcg/tci: Fix Clang build, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/10
- [PATCH 1/2] tcg: Mark more tcg_out*() functions with attribute 'unused', Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/10
- [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/10
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Thomas Huth, 2021/01/21
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/21
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang,
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/21
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/21
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Daniel P . Berrangé, 2021/01/21
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/21
- Re: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Wataru Ashihara, 2021/01/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Stefan Weil, 2021/01/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/01/23
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Alex Bennée, 2021/01/26
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Alex Bennée, 2021/01/26
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] gitlab-ci: Add a job building TCI with Clang, Wainer dos Santos Moschetta, 2021/01/21