[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] vfio: Set the priority of the VFIO VM state chang
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] vfio: Set the priority of the VFIO VM state change handler explicitly |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jan 2021 14:36:05 -0700 |
On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 16:09:18 +0800
Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com> wrote:
> In the VFIO VM state change handler, VFIO devices are transitioned
> in the _SAVING state, which should keep them from sending interrupts.
Is this comment accurate? It's my expectation that _SAVING has no
bearing on a device generating interrupts. Interrupt generation must
be allowed to continue so long as the device is _RUNNING. Thanks,
Alex
> Then we can save the pending states of all interrupts in the GIC VM
> state change handler (on ARM).
>
> So we have to set the priority of the VFIO VM state change handler
> explicitly (like virtio devices) to ensure it is called before the
> GIC's in saving.
>
> Signed-off-by: Shenming Lu <lushenming@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kirti Wankhede <kwankhede@nvidia.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/migration.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/migration.c b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> index 3b9de1353a..97ea82b100 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/migration.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/migration.c
> @@ -862,7 +862,8 @@ static int vfio_migration_init(VFIODevice *vbasedev,
> register_savevm_live(id, VMSTATE_INSTANCE_ID_ANY, 1,
> &savevm_vfio_handlers,
> vbasedev);
>
> - migration->vm_state =
> qemu_add_vm_change_state_handler(vfio_vmstate_change,
> + migration->vm_state = qdev_add_vm_change_state_handler(vbasedev->dev,
> +
> vfio_vmstate_change,
> vbasedev);
> migration->migration_state.notify = vfio_migration_state_notifier;
> add_migration_state_change_notifier(&migration->migration_state);
- Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] vfio: Set the priority of the VFIO VM state change handler explicitly,
Alex Williamson <=