[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/3] spapr, spapr_numa: fix max-associativity-domains |
Date: |
Thu, 28 Jan 2021 17:03:18 +0100 |
On Thu, 28 Jan 2021 12:17:28 -0300
Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Patches 02 and 03 contain fixes for a problem Cedric found out when
> booting TCG guests with multiple NUMA nodes. See patch 03 commit
> message for more info.
>
This paragraph mentions "TCG guests", but I see nothing that is
specific to TCG in these patches... so I expect the problem to
also exists with KVM, right ?
> First patch is an unrelated cleanup I did while investigating.
>
> Daniel Henrique Barboza (3):
> spapr: move spapr_machine_using_legacy_numa() to spapr_numa.c
> spapr_numa.c: create spapr_numa_initial_nvgpu_NUMA_id() helper
> spapr_numa.c: fix ibm,max-associativity-domains calculation
>
> hw/ppc/spapr.c | 21 ++------------------
> hw/ppc/spapr_numa.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 1 -
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_numa.h | 1 +
> 4 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>