Re: [PATCH 1/3] i386: Add missing "vmx-ept-wb" feature name

[Eduardo Habkost]

On Mon, Feb 01, 2021 at 11:59:48PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il lun 1 feb 2021, 23:54 Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> ha scritto:
> 
> > Not having a feature name in feature_word_info breaks error
> > reporting and query-cpu-model-expansion.  Add the missing feature
> > name to feature_word_info[FEAT_VMX_EPT_VPID_CAPS].feat_names[14].
> >
> This is intentional, because there's no way that any hypervisor can run if
> this feature is disabled.

If leaving the feature without name enables some desirable
behavior, that's by accident and not by design.  Which part of
the existing behavior is intentional?

-- 
Eduardo