qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH v3 16/31] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges


From: Ben Widawsky
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 16/31] hw/pci: Plumb _UID through host bridges
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2021 07:42:57 -0800

Thanks for looking! Mixing comments to Jonathan and Michael..

On 21-02-02 10:24:43, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:00:56PM +0000, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 16:59:33 -0800
> > Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > Currently, QEMU makes _UID equivalent to the bus number (_BBN). While
> > > there is nothing wrong with doing it this way, CXL spec has a heavy
> > > reliance on _UID to identify host bridges and there is no link to the
> > > bus number. Having a distinct UID solves two problems. The first is it
> > > gets us around the limitation of 256 (current max bus number).
> 
> Not sure I understand. You want more than 256 host bridges?
> 

I don't want more than 256 host bridges, but I want the ability to disaggregate
_UID and bus (_BBN). The reasoning is just to align with the spec where _UID is
used to identify a CXL host bridge which is unrelated (perhaps) to the bus
number.

> > The
> > > second is it allows us to replicate hardware configurations where bus
> > > number and uid aren't equivalent.
> 
> A bit more data on when this needs to be the case?
> 

Doesn't *need* to be the case. I was making a concerted effort to allow full
spec flexibility, but I don't believe it to be necessary unless we want to
accurately emulate a real platform.

> > The latter has benefits for our
> > > development and debugging using QEMU.
> > > 
> > > The other way to do this would be to implement the expanded bus
> > > numbering, but having an explicit uid makes more sense when trying to
> > > replicate real hardware configurations.
> > > 
> > > The QEMU commandline to utilize this would be:
> > >   -device pxb-cxl,id=cxl.0,bus="pcie.0",bus_nr=1,uid=x
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> 
> However, if doing this how do we ensure UID is still unique?
> What do we do for cases where UID was not specified?
> One idea is to generate a string UID and just stick the bus #
> in there.

This is totally mishandled in the code currently. I like your idea though.

> 
> 
> > > --
> > > 
> > > I'm guessing this patch will be somewhat controversial. For early CXL
> > > work, this can be dropped without too much heartache.
> > 
> > Whilst I'm not personally against, this maybe best to drop for now as you
> > say.
> > 

I think it'd be good to understand from the PCIe experts if CXL matches in this
regard. If PCIe generally allows (and does in practice) _UID not matching _BBN,
perhaps this is an overall improvement to the code.

> > > ---
> > >  hw/i386/acpi-build.c                |  3 ++-
> > >  hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  hw/pci/pci.c                        | 11 +++++++++++
> > >  include/hw/pci/pci.h                |  1 +
> > >  include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h            |  1 +
> > >  5 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > index cf6eb54c22..145a503e92 100644
> > > --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> > > @@ -1343,6 +1343,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > >          QLIST_FOREACH(bus, &bus->child, sibling) {
> > >              uint8_t bus_num = pci_bus_num(bus);
> > >              uint8_t numa_node = pci_bus_numa_node(bus);
> > > +            int32_t uid = pci_bus_uid(bus);
> > >  
> > >              /* look only for expander root buses */
> > >              if (!pci_bus_is_root(bus)) {
> > > @@ -1356,7 +1357,7 @@ build_dsdt(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker,
> > >              scope = aml_scope("\\_SB");
> > >              dev = aml_device("PC%.02X", bus_num);
> > >              aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_BBN", aml_int(bus_num)));
> > > -            init_pci_acpi(dev, bus_num, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : 
> > > PCI);
> > > +            init_pci_acpi(dev, uid, pci_bus_is_express(bus) ? PCIE : 
> > > PCI);
> > >  
> > >              if (numa_node != NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED) {
> > >                  aml_append(dev, aml_name_decl("_PXM", 
> > > aml_int(numa_node)));
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c 
> > > b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > index b42592e1ff..5021b60435 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci-bridge/pci_expander_bridge.c
> > > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ struct PXBDev {
> > >  
> > >      uint8_t bus_nr;
> > >      uint16_t numa_node;
> > > +    int32_t uid;
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  static PXBDev *convert_to_pxb(PCIDevice *dev)
> 
> As long as we are doing this, do we want to support a string uid too?
> How about a 64 bit uid? Why not?

If generally the idea of the patch is welcome, I am happy to change it.

> 
> 
> > > @@ -98,12 +99,20 @@ static uint16_t pxb_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
> > >      return pxb->numa_node;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int32_t pxb_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
> > > +{
> > > +    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(bus->parent_dev);
> > > +
> > > +    return pxb->uid;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void pxb_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *class, void *data)
> > >  {
> > >      PCIBusClass *pbc = PCI_BUS_CLASS(class);
> > >  
> > >      pbc->bus_num = pxb_bus_num;
> > >      pbc->numa_node = pxb_bus_numa_node;
> > > +    pbc->uid = pxb_bus_uid;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static const TypeInfo pxb_bus_info = {
> > > @@ -329,6 +338,7 @@ static Property pxb_dev_properties[] = {
> > >      /* Note: 0 is not a legal PXB bus number. */
> > >      DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("bus_nr", PXBDev, bus_nr, 0),
> > >      DEFINE_PROP_UINT16("numa_node", PXBDev, numa_node, 
> > > NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED),
> > > +    DEFINE_PROP_INT32("uid", PXBDev, uid, -1),
> > >      DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> > >  };
> > >  
> > > @@ -400,12 +410,21 @@ static const TypeInfo pxb_pcie_dev_info = {
> > >  
> > >  static void pxb_cxl_dev_realize(PCIDevice *dev, Error **errp)
> > >  {
> > > +    PXBDev *pxb = convert_to_pxb(dev);
> > > +
> > >      /* A CXL PXB's parent bus is still PCIe */
> > >      if (!pci_bus_is_express(pci_get_bus(dev))) {
> > >          error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices cannot reside on a PCI bus");
> > >          return;
> > >      }
> > >  
> > > +    if (pxb->uid < 0) {
> > > +        error_setg(errp, "pxb-cxl devices must have a valid uid 
> > > (0-2147483647)");
> > > +        return;
> > > +    }
> > > +
> > > +    /* FIXME: Check that uid doesn't collide with UIDs of other host 
> > > bridges */
> > > +
> > >      pxb_dev_realize_common(dev, CXL, errp);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > diff --git a/hw/pci/pci.c b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > index adbe8aa260..bf019d91a0 100644
> > > --- a/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > +++ b/hw/pci/pci.c
> > > @@ -170,6 +170,11 @@ static uint16_t pcibus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
> > >      return NUMA_NODE_UNASSIGNED;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +static int32_t pcibus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
> > > +{
> > > +    return -1;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> > >  {
> > >      BusClass *k = BUS_CLASS(klass);
> > > @@ -184,6 +189,7 @@ static void pci_bus_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, 
> > > void *data)
> > >  
> > >      pbc->bus_num = pcibus_num;
> > >      pbc->numa_node = pcibus_numa_node;
> > > +    pbc->uid = pcibus_uid;
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  static const TypeInfo pci_bus_info = {
> > > @@ -530,6 +536,11 @@ int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus)
> > >      return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->numa_node(bus);
> > >  }
> > >  
> > > +int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus)
> > > +{
> > > +    return PCI_BUS_GET_CLASS(bus)->uid(bus);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > >  static int get_pci_config_device(QEMUFile *f, void *pv, size_t size,
> > >                                   const VMStateField *field)
> > >  {
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci.h b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > index bde3697bee..a46de48ccd 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci.h
> > > @@ -463,6 +463,7 @@ static inline int pci_dev_bus_num(const PCIDevice 
> > > *dev)
> > >  }
> > >  
> > >  int pci_bus_numa_node(PCIBus *bus);
> > > +int pci_bus_uid(PCIBus *bus);
> > >  void pci_for_each_device(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num,
> > >                           void (*fn)(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *d, void 
> > > *opaque),
> > >                           void *opaque);
> > > diff --git a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
> > > index eb94e7e85c..3c9fbc55bb 100644
> > > --- a/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
> > > +++ b/include/hw/pci/pci_bus.h
> > > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct PCIBusClass {
> > >  
> > >      int (*bus_num)(PCIBus *bus);
> > >      uint16_t (*numa_node)(PCIBus *bus);
> > > +    int32_t (*uid)(PCIBus *bus);
> > >  };
> > >  
> > >  enum PCIBusFlags {
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]