qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 09/12] qemu-options: Replace the word 'blacklist'


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/12] qemu-options: Replace the word 'blacklist'
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2021 10:25:58 +0000
User-agent: Mutt/1.14.6 (2020-07-11)

On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 09:58:21PM +0100, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Follow the inclusive terminology from the "Conscious Language in your
> Open Source Projects" guidelines [*] and replace the word "blacklist"
> appropriately.
> 
> [*] https://github.com/conscious-lang/conscious-lang-docs/blob/main/faq.md
> 
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
> ---
>  qemu-options.hx | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
> index d0410f05125..75997ee2ea6 100644
> --- a/qemu-options.hx
> +++ b/qemu-options.hx
> @@ -4275,11 +4275,11 @@ DEF("sandbox", HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_sandbox, \
>      "                    by the kernel, but typically no longer used by 
> modern\n" \
>      "                    C library implementations.\n" \
>      "                use 'elevateprivileges' to allow or deny QEMU process 
> to elevate\n" \
> -    "                    its privileges by blacklisting all set*uid|gid 
> system calls.\n" \
> +    "                    its privileges by denylisting all set*uid|gid 
> system calls.\n" \

The original description is a bit wierd in how it reads/explains it, so
I think it needs bigger changes:

    "                use 'elevateprivileges' to allow or deny the QEMU process 
ability
    "                to elevate privileges using set*uid|gid system calls.\n" \

>      "                    The value 'children' will deny set*uid|gid system 
> calls for\n" \
>      "                    main QEMU process but will allow forks and execves 
> to run unprivileged\n" \
>      "                use 'spawn' to avoid QEMU to spawn new threads or 
> processes by\n" \
> -    "                     blacklisting *fork and execve\n" \
> +    "                     denylisting *fork and execve\n" \

denylisting is a very strange term to use - its not really a word IMHO.
Better as

    "                     preventing *fork and execve\n" \

or

    "                     blocking *fork and execve\n" \



>      "                use 'resourcecontrol' to disable process affinity and 
> schedular priority\n",
>      QEMU_ARCH_ALL)
>  SRST

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]