[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 04/93] tcg: Manage splitwx in tc_ptr_to_region_tree by han
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 04/93] tcg: Manage splitwx in tc_ptr_to_region_tree by hand |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Feb 2021 15:01:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.7; emacs 28.0.50 |
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:
> The use in tcg_tb_lookup is given a random pc that comes from the pc
> of a signal handler. Do not assert that the pointer is already within
> the code gen buffer at all, much less the writable mirror of it.
Surely we are asserting that - or at least you can find a rt entry for
the pointer passed (which we always expect to work)?
>
> Fixes: db0c51a3803
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> ---
>
> For TCI, this indicates a bug in handle_cpu_signal, in that we
> are taking PC from the host signal frame. Which is, nearly,
> unrelated to TCI at all.
>
> The TCI "pc" is tci_tb_ptr (fixed in the next patch to at least
> be thread-local). We update this only on calls, since we don't
> expect SEGV during the interpretation loop. Which works ok for
> softmmu, in which we pass down pc by hand to the helpers, but
> is not ok for user-only, where we simply perform the raw memory
> operation.
>
> I don't know how to fix this, exactly. Probably by storing to
> tci_tb_ptr before each qemu_ld/qemu_st operation, with barriers.
> Then Doing the Right Thing in handle_cpu_signal. And perhaps
> by clearing tci_tb_ptr whenever we're not expecting a SEGV on
> behalf of the guest (and thus anything left is a qemu host bug).
>
> ---
> v2: Retain full struct initialization
> ---
> tcg/tcg.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tcg/tcg.c b/tcg/tcg.c
> index bbe3dcee03..2991112829 100644
> --- a/tcg/tcg.c
> +++ b/tcg/tcg.c
> @@ -513,11 +513,21 @@ static void tcg_region_trees_init(void)
> }
> }
>
> -static struct tcg_region_tree *tc_ptr_to_region_tree(const void *cp)
> +static struct tcg_region_tree *tc_ptr_to_region_tree(const void *p)
> {
> - void *p = tcg_splitwx_to_rw(cp);
> size_t region_idx;
>
> + /*
> + * Like tcg_splitwx_to_rw, with no assert. The pc may come from
> + * a signal handler over which the caller has no control.
> + */
> + if (!in_code_gen_buffer(p)) {
> + p -= tcg_splitwx_diff;
> + if (!in_code_gen_buffer(p)) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (p < region.start_aligned) {
> region_idx = 0;
> } else {
> @@ -536,6 +546,7 @@ void tcg_tb_insert(TranslationBlock *tb)
> {
> struct tcg_region_tree *rt = tc_ptr_to_region_tree(tb->tc.ptr);
>
> + g_assert(rt != NULL);
> qemu_mutex_lock(&rt->lock);
> g_tree_insert(rt->tree, &tb->tc, tb);
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&rt->lock);
> @@ -545,6 +556,7 @@ void tcg_tb_remove(TranslationBlock *tb)
> {
> struct tcg_region_tree *rt = tc_ptr_to_region_tree(tb->tc.ptr);
>
> + g_assert(rt != NULL);
> qemu_mutex_lock(&rt->lock);
> g_tree_remove(rt->tree, &tb->tc);
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&rt->lock);
> @@ -561,6 +573,10 @@ TranslationBlock *tcg_tb_lookup(uintptr_t tc_ptr)
> TranslationBlock *tb;
> struct tb_tc s = { .ptr = (void *)tc_ptr };
>
> + if (rt == NULL) {
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> qemu_mutex_lock(&rt->lock);
> tb = g_tree_lookup(rt->tree, &s);
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&rt->lock);
--
Alex Bennée
[PATCH v2 08/93] tcg/tci: Inline tci_write_reg32s into the only caller, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03
[PATCH v2 09/93] tcg/tci: Inline tci_write_reg8 into its callers, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03
[PATCH v2 05/93] tcg/tci: Make tci_tb_ptr thread-local, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03
[PATCH v2 10/93] tcg/tci: Inline tci_write_reg16 into the only caller, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03
[PATCH v2 06/93] tcg/tci: Implement INDEX_op_ld16s_i32, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03
[PATCH v2 07/93] tcg/tci: Implement INDEX_op_ld8s_i64, Richard Henderson, 2021/02/03