qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PATCH v8 00/35] Hexagon patch series


From: Taylor Simpson
Subject: RE: [PATCH v8 00/35] Hexagon patch series
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 20:59:19 +0000


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 14, 2021 7:23 PM
> To: Taylor Simpson <tsimpson@quicinc.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Cc: philmd@redhat.com; alex.bennee@linaro.org; laurent@vivier.eu;
> ale@rev.ng; Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>; Peter Maydell
> <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/35] Hexagon patch series
>
> On 2/7/21 9:45 PM, Taylor Simpson wrote:
> > This series adds support for the Hexagon processor with Linux user support
> >
> > See patch 02 Hexagon README for detailed information.
> >
> > This series assumes int128_or() is implemented.
> > https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-10/msg06004.html
> >

What's the status of this patch?  Could you go ahead and merge it ahead of the 
rest of the series that it's in?

> >
> > Once the series is applied, the Hexagon port will pass "make check-tcg".
> > The series also includes Hexagon-specific tests in tcg/tests/hexagon.
> >
> > The final patch in the series add docker support.  Thanks to Alessandro
> > Di Federico <ale@rev.ng> and Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com> for making
> this
> > happen.  The default container (debian-hexagon-cross) uses a toolchain
> built
> > by rev.ng.  Alternatively, there is a container that will build the 
> > toolchain
> > locally (debian-hexagon-cross-build-local).
>
> Right.  This is in really good shape.
>
> I've completed review of this round, and there are some nits.  But they're
> minor enough that I wouldn't even mind them being addressed via the
> normal
> development process.  I.e. I'd be keen to not look through that diffstat 
> again.
>  ;-)

Thanks Richard!!  We're having unprecedented winter weather in Austin, so I'll 
address your latest feedback once our datacenter recovers from a power outage.

>
> Any objections from anyone else on that?
>
> I don't suppose you and Peter Maydell signed gpg keys when we all met in
> Lyon?

Nope.  Peter, please advise

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]