[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Obey NBD spec regarding block size bounds on reply
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Obey NBD spec regarding block size bounds on reply |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Feb 2021 14:40:04 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.7.0 |
On 2/18/21 2:33 PM, no-reply@patchew.org wrote:
> Patchew URL:
> 20210218201528.127099-1-eblake@redhat.com/">https://patchew.org/QEMU/20210218201528.127099-1-eblake@redhat.com/
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
> This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
> more information:
>
> 5/5 Checking commit 7be641fea748 (do not apply: Revert "nbd-client: Work
> around server BLOCK_STATUS misalignment at EOF")
> ERROR: Missing Signed-off-by: line(s)
Intentional since patch 5 is not part of the final series. (actually,
you can apply patch 5 first to see failures, then 1-4 to see how the
failures are fixed even without the interference of client-side
workarounds). But at the end of the day, once 1-4 are upstream, we want
to keep the client-side workarounds for communication with older qemu or
with other NBD servers that have a similar compliance problem as what
gets fixed here.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
- [PATCH 0/5] Obey NBD spec regarding block size bounds on reply, Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- [PATCH 1/5] iotests: Update 241 to expose backing layer fragmentation, Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- [PATCH 2/5] block: Fix BDRV_BLOCK_RAW status to honor alignment, Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- [PATCH 5/5] do not apply: Revert "nbd-client: Work around server BLOCK_STATUS misalignment at EOF", Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- [PATCH 4/5] nbd/server: Avoid unaligned dirty-bitmap status, Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- [PATCH 3/5] nbd/server: Avoid unaligned read/block_status from backing, Eric Blake, 2021/02/18
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Obey NBD spec regarding block size bounds on reply, no-reply, 2021/02/18
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] Obey NBD spec regarding block size bounds on reply,
Eric Blake <=