qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Plugin Address Translations Inconsistent/Incorrect?


From: Aaron Lindsay
Subject: Re: Plugin Address Translations Inconsistent/Incorrect?
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 15:53:54 -0500

On Feb 22 15:48, Aaron Lindsay wrote:
> On Feb 22 19:30, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > Aaron Lindsay <aaron@os.amperecomputing.com> writes:
> > That said I think we could add an additional helper to translate a
> > hwaddr to a global address space address. I'm open to suggestions of the
> > best way to structure this.
> 
> Haven't put a ton of thought into it, but what about something like this
> (untested):
> 
> uint64_t qemu_plugin_hwaddr_phys_addr(const struct qemu_plugin_hwaddr *haddr)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_SOFTMMU
>     if (haddr) {
>         if (!haddr->is_io) {
>             RAMBlock *block;
>             ram_addr_t offset;
> 
>             block = qemu_ram_block_from_host((void *) haddr->v.ram.hostaddr, 
> false, &offset);
>             if (!block) {
>                 error_report("Bad ram pointer %"PRIx64"", 
> haddr->v.ram.hostaddr);
>                 abort();
>             }
> 
>             return block->offset + offset + block->mr->addr;
>         } else {
>             MemoryRegionSection *mrs = haddr->v.io.section;
>             return haddr->v.io.offset + mrs->mr->addr;
>         }
>     }
> #endif
>     return 0;
> }

This appears to successfully return correct physical addresses for RAM
at least, though I've not tested it thoroughly for MMIO yet.

If it ends up being desirable based on the discussion elsewhere on this
thread I am willing to perform more complete testing, turn this into a
patch, and submit it.

-Aaron



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]