Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: introduce qemu_receive_packet()

[Alexander Bulekov]

On 210225 1931, P J P wrote:
> +-- On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote --+
> | On 2/24/21 2:17 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> | > On 2021/2/24 6:11 下午, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> | >> IIUC the guest could trigger an infinite loop and brick the emulated 
> | >> device model. Likely exhausting the stack, so either SEGV by corruption 
> | >> or some ENOMEM?
> | > 
> | > Yes.
> | >>
> | >> Since this is guest triggerable, shouldn't we contact qemu-security@ 
> list 
> | >> and ask for a CVE for this issue, so distributions can track the patches 
> | >> to backport in their stable releases? (it seems to be within the KVM 
> | >> devices boundary).
> | > 
> | > 
> | > That's the plan. I discussed this with Prasad before and he promise to
> | > ask CVE for this.
> 
> 'CVE-2021-3416' is assigned to this issue by Red Hat Inc.
> 

Hi Prasad,
What is the difference with CVE-2021-20255 and CVE-2021-20257 ? Aren't
those just manifestations of this bug for the e1000 and the eepro100
bug?
-Alex

> Thank you.
> --
> Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
> 8685 545E B54C 486B C6EB 271E E285 8B5A F050 DE8D