[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted? |
Date: |
Tue, 13 Apr 2021 10:25:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.5.11; emacs 28.0.50 |
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 08:06:57PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>>
>> Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 05:29:08PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Le 06/04/2021 à 18:00, Alex Bennée a écrit :
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> It's been awhile since I last played with this but I think we are
>> >> >> suffering from not having some test cases for tracing code
>> >> >> generation/execution in the tree. I tried adding a simple trace point
>> >> >> to
>> >> >> see if I could track ERET calls:
<snip>
>> >
>> > Lluís: are you happy to deprecate tcg trace events in favor of TCG
>> > plugins?
<snip>
>
> That said, I haven't used the TCG trace event functionality and maybe
> I'm missing something obvious that Lluís will point out :).
I've updated the Cc to what I think is Lluís current email as I was
getting bounces from the old academic address.
--
Alex Bennée
- trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Alex Bennée, 2021/04/06
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, no-reply, 2021/04/06
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Laurent Vivier, 2021/04/07
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Alex Bennée, 2021/04/09
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2021/04/12
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Alex Bennée, 2021/04/12
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2021/04/13
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?,
Alex Bennée <=
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Vilanova, Lluis, 2021/04/23
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Alex Bennée, 2021/04/23
- Re: trace_FOO_tcg bit-rotted?, Vilanova, Lluis, 2021/04/27