qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] gitlab-ci: Allow forks to use different set of job


From: Daniel P . Berrangé
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 14/15] gitlab-ci: Allow forks to use different set of jobs
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2021 17:58:15 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/2.0.5 (2021-01-21)

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 06:46:49PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/19/21 6:22 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 04:57:55PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> >>
> >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> writes:
> >>
> >>> Forks run the same jobs than mainstream, which might be overkill.
> >>> Allow them to easily rebase their custom set, while keeping using
> >>> the mainstream templates, and ability to pick specific jobs from
> >>> the mainstream set.
> >>>
> >>> To switch to your set, simply add your .gitlab-ci.yml as
> >>> .gitlab-ci.d/${CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE}.yml (where CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE
> >>> is your gitlab 'namespace', usually username). This file will be
> >>> used instead of the default mainstream set.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>
> >>> ---
> >>>  .gitlab-ci.yml | 7 ++++++-
> >>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> >>> index 718c8e004be..35fd35075db 100644
> >>> --- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
> >>> +++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
> >>> @@ -9,7 +9,12 @@ generate-config:
> >>>      paths:
> >>>        - generated-config.yml
> >>>    script:
> >>> -    - cp .gitlab-ci.d/qemu-project.yml generated-config.yml
> >>> +    - if test -e .gitlab-ci.d/${CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE}.yml ;
> >>> +      then
> >>> +        cp .gitlab-ci.d/${CI_PROJECT_NAMESPACE}.yml generated-config.yml 
> >>> ;
> >>> +      else
> >>> +        cp .gitlab-ci.d/qemu-project.yml generated-config.yml ;
> >>> +      fi
> >>
> >> This is going to be a little clunky. I can see a use for the static
> >> forks that Danial proposes but I guess what is needed is a little
> >> expressiveness. So how to express things like:
> >>
> >>  - I've only touched stuff in linux-user, so run only linux-user tests
> > 
> > This can be done with "rules" matching on files, but *only* if the
> > pipeline trigger is a merge request - specifically not a git branch
> > push, as the latter doesn't have the semantics you expect wrt
> > determining the "ancestor" to compare against. It only looks at commits
> > in the push, not those which may already have previously been pushed
> > on the branch.
> > 
> >>  - I'm working on KVM, run all KVM enabled builds and tests
> >>
> >>  - I've changed the core TCG code, run everything that exercises that
> >>
> >>  - I'm working on ARM, only build and run jobs that have ARM targets
> > 
> > If the stuff you work on is fairly static, we could potentially
> > allow env variables to be set by the user in their fork, which
> > the CI jobs use to filter jobs.
> > 
> >> I think we should define a minimum set of lightweight smoke tests that
> >> get the most bang for buck for catching sillies. I think checkpatch and
> >> dco checking should probably be in there - and maybe one of the bog
> >> standard build everything builds (maybe a random ../configure; make;
> >> make check on one of the supported LTS targets).
> > 
> > Could we have allow an env var  "QEMU_CI_SMOKE_TEST=1" which can be
> > set when pushing:
> > 
> >    git push  -o ci.variable="QEMU_CI_SMOKE_TEST=1"
> > 
> > 
> > which causes it to only do the minimum neccessary.
> > 
> > Alternatively, invert this, so do minimum smoke test by default
> > and require an env to run the full test. QEMU_CI_MAX=1
> > 
> > Potentially allow also  "QEMU_CI_EXTRA_JOBS=foo,bar,wizz"
> > to match against job jnames ?
> 
> Is that what you mean?
> https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg758340.html

Sort of - this is more implementing high level tags - I was actally
suggesting the explicit job names here.

eg if I see that my pull request to peter has failed on  job "foo",
then when testing fixes it is easier if I can just say run job "foo",
instead of trying to figure out which high level tag happens to pull
in job "foo".

The two approaches probably aren't mutually exclusive though.

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]