[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: Attempt to clean up all IRQs on error
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vfio-ccw: Attempt to clean up all IRQs on error |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2021 12:37:12 +0200 |
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 16:25:11 +0200
Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> The vfio_ccw_unrealize() routine makes an unconditional attempt to
> unregister every IRQ notifier, though they may not have been registered
> in the first place (when running on an older kernel, for example).
>
> Let's mirror this behavior in the error cleanups in vfio_ccw_realize()
> so that if/when new IRQs are added, it is less confusing to recognize
> the necessary procedures. The worst case scenario would be some extra
> messages about an undefined IRQ, but since this is an error exit that
> won't be the only thing to worry about.
I'm wondering whether we should downgrade the moan during unregister
from error to warn; the code deals with it gracefully, and we're not
losing any functionality.
Patch looks good.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/vfio/ccw.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/ccw.c b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> index 400bc07fe2..169438c3b8 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/ccw.c
> @@ -690,7 +690,7 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> if (vcdev->crw_region) {
> vfio_ccw_register_irq_notifier(vcdev, VFIO_CCW_CRW_IRQ_INDEX, &err);
> if (err) {
> - goto out_crw_notifier_err;
> + goto out_irq_notifier_err;
> }
> }
>
> @@ -705,7 +705,9 @@ static void vfio_ccw_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
>
> return;
>
> -out_crw_notifier_err:
> +out_irq_notifier_err:
> + vfio_ccw_unregister_irq_notifier(vcdev, VFIO_CCW_REQ_IRQ_INDEX);
> + vfio_ccw_unregister_irq_notifier(vcdev, VFIO_CCW_CRW_IRQ_INDEX);
> vfio_ccw_unregister_irq_notifier(vcdev, VFIO_CCW_IO_IRQ_INDEX);
> out_io_notifier_err:
> vfio_ccw_put_region(vcdev);