qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon


From: Trilok Soni
Subject: RE: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon
Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2021 17:15:08 +0000

Hi, I didn't realize that you had already CCed the rust-vmm mailing list, so 
anyways it is a good start. 

-----Original Message-----
From: Trilok Soni 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 10:14 AM
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>; stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org; 
rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>; Mike Holmes 
<mike.holmes@linaro.org>; Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée 
<alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.com>; Jie Deng 
<jie.deng@intel.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: RE: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon

Viresh,

For rust-vmm, you need to create the new issue in the right project. You can 
probably pick up vmm-reference project at rust-vmm and ask for the new crate. 
You can also send email to rust-vmm mailing list but github "issues" feature is 
used heavily in the rust-vmm project. There is also bi-weekly meetings which is 
attended by me, Vatsa and rust-vmm developers where it can be put up as agenda. 

The minimal requirement for the new crate is to have less (or almost none) 
dependencies on other crates so that they can be independently tested in the 
rust-vmm CI. Anyways, please file a new issue and I will ask Vatsa and others 
to comment there. 

https://github.com/rust-vmm/vhost-user-backend
http://lists.opendev.org/pipermail/rust-vmm/2021-March/000406.html

---Trilok Soni

-----Original Message-----
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> 
Sent: Wednesday, April 28, 2021 5:23 AM
To: stratos-dev@op-lists.linaro.org; rust-vmm@lists.opendev.org
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>; Mike Holmes 
<mike.holmes@linaro.org>; Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>; Alex Bennée 
<alex.bennee@linaro.org>; Arnd Bergmann <arnd.bergmann@linaro.com>; Jie Deng 
<jie.deng@intel.com>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Trilok Soni <tsoni@quicinc.com>
Subject: [RUST] Add crate for generic vhost-user-i2c backend daemon

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hello,

In my earlier attempt [1], I implemented the vhost-user-i2c backend deamon for 
QEMU (though the code was generic enough to be used with any hypervisor).

And here is a Rust implementation of the vhost-user-i2c backend daemon. Again 
this is generic enough to be used with any hypervisor and can live in its own 
repository now:

  https://github.com/vireshk/vhost-user-i2c

I am not sure what's the process to get this merged to Rust-vmm.
Can someone help ? Is that the right thing to do ?

-------------------------8<-------------------------

Here are other details (which are same since the earlier Qemu
attempt):

This is an initial implementation of a generic vhost-user backend for the I2C 
bus. This is based of the virtio specifications (already merged) for the I2C 
bus.

The kernel virtio I2C driver is still under review, here [2] is the latest 
version (v10):

The backend is implemented as a vhost-user device because we want to experiment 
in making portable backends that can be used with multiple hypervisors.  We 
also want to support backends isolated in their own separate service VMs with 
limited memory cross-sections with the principle guest. This is part of a wider 
initiative by Linaro called "project Stratos" for which you can find 
information here:

  https://collaborate.linaro.org/display/STR/Stratos+Home

I2C Testing:
------------

I didn't have access to a real hardware where I can play with a I2C client 
device (like RTC, eeprom, etc) to verify the working of the backend daemon, so 
I decided to test it on my x86 box itself with hierarchy of two ARM64 guests.

The first ARM64 guest was passed "-device ds1338,address=0x20" option, so it 
could emulate a ds1338 RTC device, which connects to an I2C bus.
Once the guest came up, ds1338 device instance was created within the guest 
kernel by doing:

  echo ds1338 0x20 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device

[
  Note that this may end up binding the ds1338 device to its driver,
  which won't let our i2c daemon talk to the device. For that we need to
  manually unbind the device from the driver:

  echo 0-0020 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0020/driver/unbind
]

After this is done, you will get /dev/rtc1. This is the device we wanted to 
emulate, which will be accessed by the vhost-user-i2c backend daemon via the 
/dev/i2c-0 file present in the guest VM.

At this point we need to start the backend daemon and give it a socket-path to 
talk to from qemu (you can pass -v to it to get more detailed messages):

  target/debug/vhost-user-i2c --socket-path=vi2c.sock -l 0:32

[ Here, 0:32 is the bus/device mapping, 0 for /dev/i2c-0 and 32 (i.e.
0x20) is client address of ds1338 that we used while creating the device. ]

Now we need to start the second level ARM64 guest (from within the first
guest) to get the i2c-virtio.c Linux driver up. The second level guest is 
passed the following options to connect to the same socket:

  -chardev socket,path=vi2c.sock,id=vi2c \
  -device vhost-user-i2c-pci,chardev=vi2c,id=i2c

Once the second level guest boots up, we will see the i2c-virtio bus at 
/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-X/. From there we can now make it emulate the
ds1338 device again by doing:

  echo ds1338 0x20 > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device

[ This time we want ds1338's driver to be bound to the device, so it should be 
enabled in the kernel as well. ]

And we will get /dev/rtc1 device again here in the second level guest.
Now we can play with the rtc device with help of hwclock utility and we can see 
the following sequence of transfers happening if we try to update rtc's time 
from system time.

hwclock -w -f /dev/rtc1 (in guest2) ->
  Reaches i2c-virtio.c (Linux bus driver in guest2) ->
    transfer over virtio ->
      Reaches the qemu's vhost-i2c device emulation (running over guest1) ->
        Reaches the backend daemon vhost-user-i2c started earlier (in guest1) ->
          ioctl(/dev/i2c-0, I2C_RDWR, ..); (in guest1) ->
            reaches qemu's hw/rtc/ds1338.c (running over host)



SMBUS Testing:
--------------

I wasn't required to have such a tedious setup for testing out with SMBUS 
devices. I was able to emulate a SMBUS device on my x86 machine using i2c-stub 
driver.

$ modprobe i2c-stub chip_addr=0x20
//Boot the arm64 guest now with i2c-virtio driver and then do:
$ echo al3320a 0x20 > /sys/class/i2c-adapter/i2c-0/new_device
$ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device0/in_illuminance_raw

That's it.

I hope I was able to give a clear picture of my test setup here :)

--
viresh

[1] 
cover.1617278395.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/">https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/cover.1617278395.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org/
[2] 
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/226a8d5663b7bb6f5d06ede7701eedb18d1bafa1.1616493817.git.jie.deng@intel.com/




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]