qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System


From: Pierre Morel
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] s390x: topology: implementating Store Topology System Information
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 11:52:21 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.13.0



On 9/7/21 10:00 AM, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 22/07/2021 19.42, Pierre Morel wrote:
The handling of STSI is enhenced with the interception of the

s/enhenced/enhanced/

yes, thanks


function code 15 for storing CPU topology.

...

+static void insert_stsi_15_1_x(S390CPU *cpu, int sel2, __u64 addr, uint8_t ar)
+{
+    const MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());
+    void *p;
+    int ret, cc;
+
+    /*
+     * Until the SCLP STSI Facility reporting the MNEST value is used,
+     * a sel2 value of 2 is the only value allowed in STSI 15.1.x.
+     */
+    if (sel2 != 2) {
+        setcc(cpu, 3);
+        return;
+    }
+
+    p = g_malloc0(4096);

Use TARGET_PAGE_SIZE instead of magic value 4096?
yes

+   insert_stsi_15_1_2(machine, p);

Wrong indentation (3 instead of 4 spaces).

oh, yes, thanks


+    if (s390_is_pv()) {
+        ret = s390_cpu_pv_mem_write(cpu, 0, p, 4096);
+    } else {
+        ret = s390_cpu_virt_mem_write(cpu, addr, ar, p, 4096);

TARGET_PAGE_SIZE?

yes, of course.


+    }
+    cc = ret ? 3 : 0;
+    setcc(cpu, cc);
+    g_free(p);
+}
+
  static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu)
  {
      CPUState *cs = CPU(cpu);
@@ -1920,6 +2017,10 @@ static int handle_stsi(S390CPU *cpu)
          /* Only sysib 3.2.2 needs post-handling for now. */
          insert_stsi_3_2_2(cpu, run->s390_stsi.addr, run->s390_stsi.ar);
          return 0;
+    case 15:
+        insert_stsi_15_1_x(cpu, run->s390_stsi.sel2, run->s390_stsi.addr,
+                           run->s390_stsi.ar);
+        return 0;
      default:
          return 0;
      }


  Thomas


Thanks for reviewing,
Pierre

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]