qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] hw/char/mchp_pfsoc_mmuart: QOM'ify PolarFire MMUART


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hw/char/mchp_pfsoc_mmuart: QOM'ify PolarFire MMUART
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 12:56:01 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0

On 9/23/21 12:52, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 9/23/21 12:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Thu, 23 Sept 2021 at 11:29, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
On 9/23/21 07:16, Bin Meng wrote:> On Sun, Sep 19, 2021 at 2:07 AM
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org> wrote:
+static void mchp_pfsoc_mmuart_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
+{
+    MchpPfSoCMMUartState *s = MCHP_PFSOC_UART(dev);
+
+    qdev_prop_set_uint8(DEVICE(&s->serial_mm), "regshift", 2);
+    qdev_prop_set_uint32(DEVICE(&s->serial_mm), "baudbase", 399193);
+    qdev_prop_set_uint8(DEVICE(&s->serial_mm), "endianness",
+                        DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN);

It looks like serial_mm_init() does one more thing:

      qdev_set_legacy_instance_id(DEVICE(smm), base, 2);

I am not sure what that is.

I'll defer on Paolo / Marc-André for that part, I think this is for
migrating legacy (x86?) machines, which is not the case.

Yes, this is only needed for backwards-compatibility of incoming
migration data with old versions of QEMU which implemented migration
of devices with hand-rolled code. If a device didn't previously
handle migration at all then it should not now be setting the
legacy instance ID.

Thanks. I'll try to add that in the documentation somewhere.

Speaking of migration, I notice that this QOM conversion does
not add a vmstate, which usually we do as part of the QOM conversion.
The device is also missing a reset method.

Sigh, you reminded me of this series:
"hw: Mark devices with no migratable fields"
https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/20210117192446.23753-19-f4bug@amsat.org/


OK, I'll add that in a previous patch.

Thanks,

Phil.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]