qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4] Prevent vhost-user-blk-test hang


From: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] Prevent vhost-user-blk-test hang
Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2021 16:22:21 -0500
User-agent: NeoMutt/20210205-773-8890a5

On Thu, Sep 23, 2021 at 03:16:17PM +0000, Raphael Norwitz wrote:
> In the vhost-user-blk-test, as of now there is nothing stoping
> vhost-user-blk in QEMU writing to the socket right after forking off the
> storage daemon before it has a chance to come up properly, leaving the
> test hanging forever. This intermittently hanging test has caused QEMU
> automation failures reported multiple times on the mailing list [1].
> 
> This change makes the storage-daemon notify the vhost-user-blk-test
> that it is fully initialized and ready to handle client connections by
> creating a pidfile on initialiation. This ensures that the storage-daemon
> backend won't miss vhost-user messages and thereby resolves the hang.
> 
> [1] 
> https://lore.kernel.org/qemu-devel/CAFEAcA8kYpz9LiPNxnWJAPSjc=nv532bEdyfynaBeMeohqBp3A@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raphael Norwitz <raphael.norwitz@nutanix.com>
> ---
> Accidentally left a raw free() in v3. Converted it to g_free() here.
> 
>  tests/qtest/vhost-user-blk-test.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/vhost-user-blk-test.c 
> b/tests/qtest/vhost-user-blk-test.c
> index 6f108a1b62..6898f55f11 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/vhost-user-blk-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/vhost-user-blk-test.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>  #define TEST_IMAGE_SIZE         (64 * 1024 * 1024)
>  #define QVIRTIO_BLK_TIMEOUT_US  (30 * 1000 * 1000)
>  #define PCI_SLOT_HP             0x06
> +#define PIDFILE_RETRIES         5
>  
>  typedef struct {
>      pid_t pid;
> @@ -885,7 +886,8 @@ static void start_vhost_user_blk(GString *cmd_line, int 
> vus_instances,
>                                   int num_queues)
>  {
>      const char *vhost_user_blk_bin = qtest_qemu_storage_daemon_binary();
> -    int i;
> +    int i, retries;
> +    char *daemon_pidfile_path;
>      gchar *img_path;
>      GString *storage_daemon_command = g_string_new(NULL);
>      QemuStorageDaemonState *qsd;
> @@ -898,6 +900,9 @@ static void start_vhost_user_blk(GString *cmd_line, int 
> vus_instances,
>              " -object memory-backend-memfd,id=mem,size=256M,share=on "
>              " -M memory-backend=mem -m 256M ");
>  
> +    daemon_pidfile_path = g_strdup_printf("/tmp/daemon-%d", getpid());
> +    g_assert_cmpint((uintptr_t) daemon_pidfile_path, !=, (uintptr_t) NULL);

Feels verbose compared to:
g_assert(daemon_pidfile_path)

For that matter, can g_strdup_printf() ever return NULL?  On memory
error, it exit()s rather than returning.  So this assert feels like
overkill.

Otherwise,

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]