qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 29/30] accel/tcg/user-exec: Implement CPU-specific signal


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 29/30] accel/tcg/user-exec: Implement CPU-specific signal handler for loongarch64 hosts
Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2021 12:25:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0

On 9/24/21 19:25, WANG Xuerui wrote:
Signed-off-by: WANG Xuerui <git@xen0n.name>
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
  accel/tcg/user-exec.c | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  1 file changed, 73 insertions(+)

diff --git a/accel/tcg/user-exec.c b/accel/tcg/user-exec.c
index 8fed542622..38d4ad8a7d 100644
--- a/accel/tcg/user-exec.c
+++ b/accel/tcg/user-exec.c
@@ -878,6 +878,79 @@ int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo,
      return handle_cpu_signal(pc, info, is_write, &uc->uc_sigmask);
  }
+#elif defined(__loongarch64)
+
+int cpu_signal_handler(int host_signum, void *pinfo,
+                       void *puc)
+{
+    siginfo_t *info = pinfo;
+    ucontext_t *uc = puc;
+    greg_t pc = uc->uc_mcontext.__pc;
+    uint32_t insn = *(uint32_t *)pc;
+    int is_write = 0;

Predating this patch, but is_write should be boolean.

Note this will clash with Richard signal rework:
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2021-09/msg04804.html

Anyhow,
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>

+
+    /* Detect store by reading the instruction at the program counter.  */
+    switch ((insn >> 26) & 0b111111) {
+    case 0b001000: /* {ll,sc}.[wd] */
+        switch ((insn >> 24) & 0b11) {
+        case 0b01: /* sc.w */
+        case 0b11: /* sc.d */
+            is_write = 1;
+            break;
+        }
+        break;
+    case 0b001001: /* {ld,st}ox4.[wd] ({ld,st}ptr.[wd]) */
+        switch ((insn >> 24) & 0b11) {
+        case 0b01: /* stox4.w (stptr.w) */
+        case 0b11: /* stox4.d (stptr.d) */
+            is_write = 1;
+            break;
+        }
+        break;
+    case 0b001010: /* {ld,st}.* family */
+        switch ((insn >> 22) & 0b1111) {
+        case 0b0100: /* st.b */
+        case 0b0101: /* st.h */
+        case 0b0110: /* st.w */
+        case 0b0111: /* st.d */
+        case 0b1101: /* fst.s */
+        case 0b1111: /* fst.d */
+            is_write = 1;
+            break;
+        }
+        break;
+    case 0b001110: /* indexed, atomic, bounds-checking memory operations */
+        uint32_t sel = (insn >> 15) & 0b11111111111;
+
+        switch (sel) {
+        case 0b00000100000: /* stx.b */
+        case 0b00000101000: /* stx.h */
+        case 0b00000110000: /* stx.w */
+        case 0b00000111000: /* stx.d */
+        case 0b00001110000: /* fstx.s */
+        case 0b00001111000: /* fstx.d */
+        case 0b00011101100: /* fstgt.s */
+        case 0b00011101101: /* fstgt.d */
+        case 0b00011101110: /* fstle.s */
+        case 0b00011101111: /* fstle.d */
+        case 0b00011111000: /* stgt.b */
+        case 0b00011111001: /* stgt.h */
+        case 0b00011111010: /* stgt.w */
+        case 0b00011111011: /* stgt.d */
+        case 0b00011111100: /* stle.b */
+        case 0b00011111101: /* stle.h */
+        case 0b00011111110: /* stle.w */
+        case 0b00011111111: /* stle.d */
+        case 0b00011000000 ... 0b00011100011: /* am* insns */
+            is_write = 1;
+            break;
+        }
+        break;
+    }
+
+    return handle_cpu_signal(pc, info, is_write, &uc->uc_sigmask);
+}
+
  #else
#error host CPU specific signal handler needed




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]