qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2] tests/acceptance: Test powernv machines


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tests/acceptance: Test powernv machines
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 19:52:51 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.1.0

On 9/27/21 19:37, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> On 9/27/21 19:21, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 8/17/21 11:30, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
>>> Fetch the OpenPOWER images to boot the powernv8 and powernv9 machines
>>> with a simple PCI layout.
>>>
>>> Cc: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Wainer dos Santos Moschetta <wainersm@redhat.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@kaod.org>
>>> ---
>>>
>>>   Since v2:
>>>
>>>   - Change the skiboot.lid file to use the one shipped with QEMU
>>>     tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py | 35
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> index 5248c8097df9..59c9309c4d0b 100644
>>> --- a/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> +++ b/tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py
>>> @@ -1176,6 +1176,41 @@ def test_ppc64_e500(self):
>>>           tar_hash = '6951d86d644b302898da2fd701739c9406527fe1'
>>>           self.do_test_advcal_2018('19', tar_hash, 'uImage')
>>>   +    def do_test_ppc64_powernv(self, proc):
>>> +        images_url =
>>> ('https://github.com/open-power/op-build/releases/download/v2.7/')
>>> +
>>> +        kernel_url = images_url + 'zImage.epapr'
>>> +        kernel_hash =
>>> '0ab237df661727e5392cee97460e8674057a883c5f74381a128fa772588d45cd'
>>> +        kernel_path = self.fetch_asset(kernel_url,
>>> asset_hash=kernel_hash,
>>> +                                       algorithm='sha256')
>>> +        self.vm.set_console()
>>> +        self.vm.add_args('-kernel', kernel_path,
>>> +                         '-append', 'console=tty0 console=hvc0',
>>> +                         '-device',
>>> 'pcie-pci-bridge,id=bridge1,bus=pcie.1,addr=0x0',
>>> +                         '-device',
>>> 'nvme,bus=pcie.2,addr=0x0,serial=1234',
>>> +                         '-device', 'e1000e,bus=bridge1,addr=0x3',
>>> +                         '-device',
>>> 'nec-usb-xhci,bus=bridge1,addr=0x2')
>>> +        self.vm.launch()
>>> +
>>> +        self.wait_for_console_pattern("CPU: " + proc + " generation
>>> processor")
>>> +        self.wait_for_console_pattern("zImage starting: loaded")
>>> +        self.wait_for_console_pattern("Run /init as init process")
>>> +        self.wait_for_console_pattern("Creating 1 MTD partitions")
>>> +
>>> +    def test_ppc_powernv8(self):
>>> +        """
>>> +        :avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
>>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:powernv8
>>> +        """
>>> +        self.do_test_ppc64_powernv('P8')
>>> +
>>> +    def test_ppc_powernv9(self):
>>> +        """
>>> +        :avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
>>> +        :avocado: tags=machine:powernv9
>>> +        """
>>> +        self.do_test_ppc64_powernv('P9')
>>> +
>>>       def test_ppc_g3beige(self):
>>>           """
>>>           :avocado: tags=arch:ppc
>>>
>>
>> Kinda borderline w.r.t. 90 sec timeout limit... (using --enable-debug):
>>
>> JOB ID     : 5229c34e837b7b6de18c68115b07f0eebc446784
>> JOB LOG    :
>> /home/phil/avocado/job-results/job-2021-09-27T19.15-5229c34/job.log
>>   (1/3)
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc64_e500:
>> PASS (6.58 s)
>>   (2/3)
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_powernv8:
>>
>> PASS (80.38 s)
>>   (3/3)
>> tests/acceptance/boot_linux_console.py:BootLinuxConsole.test_ppc_powernv9:
>>
>> PASS (89.22 s)
>> RESULTS    : PASS 3 | ERROR 0 | FAIL 0 | SKIP 0 | WARN 0 | INTERRUPT 0 |
>> CANCEL 0
>> JOB TIME   : 176.84 s
> 
> It's too long I agree and I can remove some of the PCI adapters which
> need training.
> 
> What's your laptop like ?

i7-8650U, but maybe better ask Gitlab what are theirs runners like ;)




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]