[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM
From: |
Xiaoyao Li |
Subject: |
[RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM |
Date: |
Thu, 12 May 2022 11:17:49 +0800 |
The RAM of TDX VM can be classified into two types:
- TDX_RAM_UNACCEPTED: default type of TDX memory, which needs to be
accepted by TDX guest before it can be used and will be all-zeros
after being accepted.
- TDX_RAM_ADDED: the RAM that is ADD'ed to TD guest before running, and
can be used directly. E.g., TD HOB and TEMP MEM that needed by TDVF.
Maintain TdxRamEntries[] which grabs the initial RAM info from e820 table
and mark each RAM range as default type TDX_RAM_UNACCEPTED.
Then turn the range of TD HOB and TEMP MEM to TDX_RAM_ADDED since these
ranges will be ADD'ed before TD runs and no need to be accepted runtime.
The TdxRamEntries[] are later used to setup the memory TD resource HOB
that passes memory info from QEMU to TDVF.
Signed-off-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
---
target/i386/kvm/tdx.c | 99 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
target/i386/kvm/tdx.h | 14 ++++++
2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
index 8bac49419f37..e7071bfe4c9c 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include "sysemu/kvm.h"
#include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
+#include "hw/i386/e820_memory_layout.h"
#include "hw/i386/x86.h"
#include "hw/i386/tdvf.h"
#include "kvm_i386.h"
@@ -129,11 +130,105 @@ static void get_tdx_capabilities(void)
tdx_caps = caps;
}
+static void tdx_add_ram_entry(uint64_t address, uint64_t length, uint32_t type)
+{
+ uint32_t nr_entries = tdx_guest->nr_ram_entries;
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries = g_renew(TdxRamEntry, tdx_guest->ram_entries,
+ nr_entries + 1);
+
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[nr_entries].address = address;
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[nr_entries].length = length;
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[nr_entries].type = type;
+ tdx_guest->nr_ram_entries++;
+}
+
+static int tdx_accept_ram_range(uint64_t address, uint64_t length)
+{
+ TdxRamEntry *e;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < tdx_guest->nr_ram_entries; i++) {
+ e = &tdx_guest->ram_entries[i];
+
+ if (address + length < e->address ||
+ e->address + e->length < address) {
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (e->address > address ||
+ e->address + e->length < address + length) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (e->address == address && e->length == length) {
+ e->type = TDX_RAM_ADDED;
+ } else if (e->address == address) {
+ e->address += length;
+ e->length -= length;
+ tdx_add_ram_entry(address, length, TDX_RAM_ADDED);
+ } else if (e->address + e->length == address + length) {
+ e->length -= length;
+ tdx_add_ram_entry(address, length, TDX_RAM_ADDED);
+ } else {
+ TdxRamEntry tmp = {
+ .address = e->address,
+ .length = e->length,
+ };
+ e->length = address - tmp.address;
+
+ tdx_add_ram_entry(address, length, TDX_RAM_ADDED);
+ tdx_add_ram_entry(address + length,
+ tmp.address + tmp.length - (address + length),
+ TDX_RAM_UNACCEPTED);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static int tdx_ram_entry_compare(const void *lhs_, const void* rhs_)
+{
+ const TdxRamEntry *lhs = lhs_;
+ const TdxRamEntry *rhs = rhs_;
+
+ if (lhs->address == rhs->address) {
+ return 0;
+ }
+ if (le64_to_cpu(lhs->address) > le64_to_cpu(rhs->address)) {
+ return 1;
+ }
+ return -1;
+}
+
+static void tdx_init_ram_entries(void)
+{
+ unsigned i, j, nr_e820_entries;
+
+ nr_e820_entries = e820_get_num_entries();
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries = g_new(TdxRamEntry, nr_e820_entries);
+
+ for (i = 0, j = 0; i < nr_e820_entries; i++) {
+ uint64_t addr, len;
+
+ if (e820_get_entry(i, E820_RAM, &addr, &len)) {
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[j].address = addr;
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[j].length = len;
+ tdx_guest->ram_entries[j].type = TDX_RAM_UNACCEPTED;
+ j++;
+ }
+ }
+ tdx_guest->nr_ram_entries = j;
+}
+
static void tdx_finalize_vm(Notifier *notifier, void *unused)
{
TdxFirmware *tdvf = &tdx_guest->tdvf;
TdxFirmwareEntry *entry;
+ tdx_init_ram_entries();
+
for_each_tdx_fw_entry(tdvf, entry) {
switch (entry->type) {
case TDVF_SECTION_TYPE_BFV:
@@ -144,12 +239,16 @@ static void tdx_finalize_vm(Notifier *notifier, void
*unused)
case TDVF_SECTION_TYPE_TEMP_MEM:
entry->mem_ptr = qemu_ram_mmap(-1, entry->size,
qemu_real_host_page_size(), 0, 0);
+ tdx_accept_ram_range(entry->address, entry->size);
break;
default:
error_report("Unsupported TDVF section %d", entry->type);
exit(1);
}
}
+
+ qsort(tdx_guest->ram_entries, tdx_guest->nr_ram_entries,
+ sizeof(TdxRamEntry), &tdx_ram_entry_compare);
}
static Notifier tdx_machine_done_notify = {
diff --git a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.h b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.h
index 12bcf25bb95b..5792518afa62 100644
--- a/target/i386/kvm/tdx.h
+++ b/target/i386/kvm/tdx.h
@@ -15,6 +15,17 @@ typedef struct TdxGuestClass {
ConfidentialGuestSupportClass parent_class;
} TdxGuestClass;
+enum TdxRamType{
+ TDX_RAM_UNACCEPTED,
+ TDX_RAM_ADDED,
+};
+
+typedef struct TdxRamEntry {
+ uint64_t address;
+ uint64_t length;
+ uint32_t type;
+} TdxRamEntry;
+
typedef struct TdxGuest {
ConfidentialGuestSupport parent_obj;
@@ -24,6 +35,9 @@ typedef struct TdxGuest {
uint64_t attributes; /* TD attributes */
TdxFirmware tdvf;
+
+ uint32_t nr_ram_entries;
+ TdxRamEntry *ram_entries;
} TdxGuest;
#ifdef CONFIG_TDX
--
2.27.0
- [RFC PATCH v4 19/36] i386/tdx: Don't initialize pc.rom for TDX VMs, (continued)
- [RFC PATCH v4 19/36] i386/tdx: Don't initialize pc.rom for TDX VMs, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11
- [RFC PATCH v4 15/36] i386/tdx: Set kvm_readonly_mem_enabled to false for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11
- [RFC PATCH v4 20/36] i386/tdx: Register a machine_init_done callback for TD, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11
- [RFC PATCH v4 17/36] i386/tdx: Parse TDVF metadata for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11
- [RFC PATCH v4 21/36] i386/tdx: Track mem_ptr for each firmware entry of TDVF, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11
- [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM,
Xiaoyao Li <=
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Gerd Hoffmann, 2022/05/24
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/26
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Isaku Yamahata, 2022/05/26
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/27
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Gerd Hoffmann, 2022/05/30
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/30
- Re: [RFC PATCH v4 22/36] i386/tdx: Track RAM entries for TDX VM, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/27
[RFC PATCH v4 24/36] i386/tdx: Add TDVF memory via KVM_TDX_INIT_MEM_REGION, Xiaoyao Li, 2022/05/11