qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v1 00/40] TDX QEMU support


From: Xiaoyao Li
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 00/40] TDX QEMU support
Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 18:55:48 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 Thunderbird/91.11.0

On 8/2/2022 5:49 PM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 03:47:10PM +0800, Xiaoyao Li wrote:

- CPU model

   We cannot create a TD with arbitrary CPU model like what for non-TDX VMs,
   because only a subset of features can be configured for TD.
- It's recommended to use '-cpu host' to create TD;
   - '+feature/-feature' might not work as expected;

   future work: To introduce specific CPU model for TDs and enhance +/-features
                for TDs.

Which features are incompatible with TDX ?

TDX enforces some features fixed to 1 (e.g., CPUID_EXT_X2APIC, CPUID_EXT_HYPERVISOR)and some fixed to 0 (e.g., CPUID_EXT_VMX ).

Details can be found in patch 8 and TDX spec chapter "CPUID virtualization"

Presumably you have such a list, so that KVM can block them when
using '-cpu host' ?

No, KVM doesn't do this. The result is no error reported from KVM but what TD OS sees from CPUID might be different what user specifies in QEMU.

If so, we should be able to sanity check the
use of these features in QEMU for the named CPU models / feature
selection too.

This series enhances get_supported_cpuid() for TDX. If named CPU models are used to boot a TDX guest, it likely gets warning of "xxx feature is not available"

We have another series to enhance the "-feature" for TDX, to warn out if some fixed1 is specified to be removed. Besides, we will introduce specific named CPU model for TDX. e.g., TDX-SapphireRapids which contains the maximum feature set a TDX guest can have on SPR host.


With regards,
Daniel




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]