Re: [PATCH v7 08/14] KVM: Rename mmu_notifier_*

[Chao Peng]

On Fri, Jul 29, 2022 at 07:02:12PM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2022, Chao Peng wrote:
> > The sync mechanism between mmu_notifier and page fault handler employs
> > fields mmu_notifier_seq/count and mmu_notifier_range_start/end. For the
> > to be added private memory, there is the same mechanism needed but not
> > rely on mmu_notifier (It uses new introduced memfile_notifier). This
> > patch renames the existing fields and related helper functions to a
> > neutral name mmu_updating_* so private memory can reuse.
> 
> mmu_updating_* is too broad of a term, e.g. page faults and many other 
> operations
> also update the mmu.  Although the name most definitely came from the 
> mmu_notifier,
> it's not completely inaccurate for other sources, e.g. KVM's MMU is still 
> being
> notified of something, even if the source is not the actual mmu_notifier.
> 
> If we really want a different name, I'd vote for nomenclature that captures 
> the
> invalidation aspect, which is really what the variables are all trackng, e.g.
> 
>   mmu_invalidate_seq
>   mmu_invalidate_in_progress
>   mmu_invalidate_range_start
>   mmu_invalidate_range_end

Looks good to me. Thanks.

Chao