qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg


From: Mayuresh Chitale
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 2/4] target/riscv: smstateen check for h/senvcfg
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2022 09:06:32 +0530
User-agent: Evolution 3.36.5-0ubuntu1

On Wed, 2022-08-03 at 16:24 +0800, Weiwei Li wrote:
> 在 2022/8/2 上午1:18, Mayuresh Chitale 写道:
> > Accesses to henvcfg, henvcfgh and senvcfg are allowed only if
> > corresponding bit in mstateen0/hstateen0 is enabled. Otherwise an
> > illegal instruction trap is generated.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mayuresh Chitale <mchitale@ventanamicro.com>
> > ---
> >   roms/opensbi       |  2 +-
> >   target/riscv/csr.c | 83
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >   2 files changed, 77 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/roms/opensbi b/roms/opensbi
> > index 4489876e93..48f91ee9c9 160000
> > --- a/roms/opensbi
> > +++ b/roms/opensbi
> > @@ -1 +1 @@
> > -Subproject commit 4489876e933d8ba0d8bc6c64bae71e295d45faac
> > +Subproject commit 48f91ee9c960f048c4a7d1da4447d31e04931e38
> > diff --git a/target/riscv/csr.c b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > index ad1642fb9b..011d6c5976 100644
> > --- a/target/riscv/csr.c
> > +++ b/target/riscv/csr.c
> > @@ -40,6 +40,38 @@ void riscv_set_csr_ops(int csrno,
> > riscv_csr_operations *ops)
> >   }
> >   
> >   /* Predicates */
> > +#if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > +static RISCVException smstateen_acc_ok(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > index,
> > +                                       uint64_t bit)
> > +{
> > +    bool virt = riscv_cpu_virt_enabled(env);
> > +    CPUState *cs = env_cpu(env);
> > +    RISCVCPU *cpu = RISCV_CPU(cs);
> > +
> > +    if (env->priv == PRV_M || !cpu->cfg.ext_smstateen) {
> > +        return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (!(env->mstateen[index] & bit)) {
> > +        return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (virt) {
> > +        if (!(env->hstateen[index] & bit)) {
> > +            return RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT;
> > +        }
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    if (env->priv == PRV_U && riscv_has_ext(env, RVS)) {
> > +        if (!(env->sstateen[index] & bit)) {
> > +            return RISCV_EXCP_ILLEGAL_INST;
> > +        }
> 
> VU mode seems not be taken into consideration. For VU mode, the 
> exception will be
> 
> RISCV_EXCP_VIRT_INSTRUCTION_FAULT instead if "!(env->sstateen[index]
> & bit)" here.
Ok. I will fix it in the next version.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Weiwei Li
> 
> > +    }
> > +
> > +    return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> > +}
> > +#endif
> > +
> >   static RISCVException fs(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno)
> >   {
> >   #if !defined(CONFIG_USER_ONLY)
> > @@ -1715,6 +1747,13 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_menvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException read_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >                                    target_ulong *val)
> >   {
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> > +
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> > +
> >       *val = env->senvcfg;
> >       return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >   }
> > @@ -1723,15 +1762,27 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_senvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >                                     target_ulong val)
> >   {
> >       uint64_t mask = SENVCFG_FIOM | SENVCFG_CBIE | SENVCFG_CBCFE |
> > SENVCFG_CBZE;
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> >   
> > -    env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> >   
> > +    env->senvcfg = (env->senvcfg & ~mask) | (val & mask);
> >       return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >   }
> >   
> >   static RISCVException read_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >                                    target_ulong *val)
> >   {
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> > +
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> > +
> >       *val = env->henvcfg;
> >       return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >   }
> > @@ -1740,6 +1791,12 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >                                     target_ulong val)
> >   {
> >       uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_FIOM | HENVCFG_CBIE | HENVCFG_CBCFE |
> > HENVCFG_CBZE;
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> > +
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> >   
> >       if (riscv_cpu_mxl(env) == MXL_RV64) {
> >           mask |= HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE;
> > @@ -1753,6 +1810,13 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_henvcfg(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException read_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                    target_ulong *val)
> >   {
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> > +
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> > +
> >       *val = env->henvcfg >> 32;
> >       return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >   }
> > @@ -1762,9 +1826,14 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_henvcfgh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   {
> >       uint64_t mask = HENVCFG_PBMTE | HENVCFG_STCE;
> >       uint64_t valh = (uint64_t)val << 32;
> > +    RISCVException ret;
> >   
> > -    env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);
> > +    ret = smstateen_acc_ok(env, 0, SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG);
> > +    if (ret != RISCV_EXCP_NONE) {
> > +        return ret;
> > +    }
> >   
> > +    env->henvcfg = (env->henvcfg & ~mask) | (valh & mask);
> >       return RISCV_EXCP_NONE;
> >   }
> >   
> > @@ -1796,7 +1865,7 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_mstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException write_mstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                         target_ulong new_val)
> >   {
> > -    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN;
> > +    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
> >   
> >       return write_mstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
> >   }
> > @@ -1843,7 +1912,7 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_mstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException write_mstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                         target_ulong new_val)
> >   {
> > -    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN;
> > +    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
> >   
> >       return write_mstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
> >   }
> > @@ -1892,7 +1961,7 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_hstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException write_hstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                         target_ulong new_val)
> >   {
> > -    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN;
> > +    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
> >   
> >       return write_hstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
> >   }
> > @@ -1943,7 +2012,7 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_hstateenh(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException write_hstateen0h(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                          target_ulong new_val)
> >   {
> > -    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN;
> > +    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
> >   
> >       return write_hstateenh(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
> >   }
> > @@ -2002,7 +2071,7 @@ static RISCVException
> > write_sstateen(CPURISCVState *env, int csrno,
> >   static RISCVException write_sstateen0(CPURISCVState *env, int
> > csrno,
> >                                         target_ulong new_val)
> >   {
> > -    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN;
> > +    uint64_t wr_mask = SMSTATEEN_STATEEN | SMSTATEEN0_HSENVCFG;
> >   
> >       return write_sstateen(env, csrno, wr_mask, new_val);
> >   }




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]