[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH V2] net/colo.c: Fix the pointer issuse reported by Coverity.
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH V2] net/colo.c: Fix the pointer issuse reported by Coverity. |
Date: |
Fri, 5 Aug 2022 10:56:42 +0100 |
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 10:53, Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com> wrote:
>
> When enable the virtio-net-pci, guest network packet will
> load the vnet_hdr. In COLO status, the primary VM's network
> packet maybe redirect to another VM, it need filter-redirect
> enable the vnet_hdr flag at the same time, COLO-proxy will
> correctly parse the original network packet. If have any
> misconfiguration here, the vnet_hdr_len is wrong for parse
> the packet, the data+offset will point to wrong place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Chen <chen.zhang@intel.com>
> ---
> net/colo.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo.c b/net/colo.c
> index 6b0ff562ad..524afa3d9b 100644
> --- a/net/colo.c
> +++ b/net/colo.c
> @@ -44,21 +44,22 @@ int parse_packet_early(Packet *pkt)
> {
> int network_length;
> static const uint8_t vlan[] = {0x81, 0x00};
> - uint8_t *data = pkt->data + pkt->vnet_hdr_len;
> + uint8_t *data = pkt->data;
> uint16_t l3_proto;
> ssize_t l2hdr_len;
>
> - if (data == NULL) {
> - trace_colo_proxy_main_vnet_info("This packet is not parsed
> correctly, "
> + assert(data);
> +
> + /* Check the received vnet_hdr_len then add the offset */
> + if (pkt->size < sizeof(struct eth_header) + sizeof(struct vlan_header)
> + + pkt->vnet_hdr_len) {
I think this expression needs more care to avoid overflow
with a maliciously over-large vnet_hdr_len value.
Casting pkt->vnet_hdr_len to int64_t would be one way to do that;
there may be better approaches.
thanks
-- PMM