qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] linux-user/aarch64: Reset target data on MADV_DONTNE


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [PATCH] linux-user/aarch64: Reset target data on MADV_DONTNEED
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 09:41:19 +0100
User-agent: mu4e 1.8.9; emacs 28.1.91

Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> writes:

> Le 11/08/2022 à 17:18, Alex Bennée a écrit :
>> Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> writes:
>> 
>>> Le 11/08/2022 à 13:54, Peter Maydell a écrit :
>>>> On Thu, 11 Aug 2022 at 09:29, Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Le 10/08/2022 à 22:47, Richard Henderson a écrit :
>>>>>> On 8/10/22 13:32, Vitaly Buka wrote:
>>>>>>> Sorry, I only noticed today that it's not submitted.
>>>>>>> Version is not critical for us, as we build from masters anyway.
>>>>>>> Richard, do you know a reason to consider this critical?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 13:04, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org
>>>>>>> <mailto:peter.maydell@linaro.org>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 21:00, Vitaly Buka <vitalybuka@google.com
>>>>>>>       <mailto:vitalybuka@google.com>> wrote:
>>>>>>>        >
>>>>>>>        > How can we land this one?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Pinging it a week ago rather than now would have been a good 
>>>>>>> start :-(
>>>>>>>       I think it got missed because you didn't cc the linux-user 
>>>>>>> maintainer.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>       Is this a critical fix for 7.1 or can we let it slip to 7.2 ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's unfortunate that it got missed.  It's not critical, but it would be 
>>>>>> nice, because support for
>>>>>> MADV_DONTNEED is new in 7.1 (previously, we ignored all madvise).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll note there are missing braces for coding style on an IF.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Laurent, do you have an objection to merging this for rc3?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> No objection.
>>>>>
>>>>> Do you want it goes via the arm branch or via the linux-user branch?
>>>>>
>>>>> If it goes via linux-user I can run the LTP testsuite but it takes 1 day.
>>>> I think we should definitely run the LTP testsuite on it, so
>>>> taking it via linux-user probably makes more sense.
>>>
>>> ok, applied to my linux-user-for-7.1 branch.
>>>
>>> Running tests.
>> Any chance you could pick up:
>>    Subject: [PATCH v2] linux-user: un-parent OBJECT(cpu) when
>> closing thread
>>    Date: Wed,  3 Aug 2022 14:05:37 +0100
>>    Message-Id: <20220803130537.763666-1-alex.bennee@linaro.org>
>> before you run the tests?
>> 
>
> I've tested it, it works fine.
>
> Do you plan to do a PR including it or do you want I do (there will be
> only this one in mine)?

I'm going to a roll a PR today so I can include it. Shall I add a
Tested-by for you?

>
> Thanks,
> Laurent


-- 
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]