qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 6/9] parallels: Move check of cluster outside image to a sepa


From: Denis V. Lunev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] parallels: Move check of cluster outside image to a separate function
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2022 14:56:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0

On 18.08.2022 17:14, Alexander Ivanov wrote:
We will add more and more checks so we need a better code structure
in parallels_co_check. Let each check performs in a separate loop
in a separate helper.
s->data_end fix relates to out-of-image check so move it
to the helper too.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Ivanov <alexander.ivanov@virtuozzo.com>
---
  block/parallels.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block/parallels.c b/block/parallels.c
index 3900a0f4a9..1c7626c867 100644
--- a/block/parallels.c
+++ b/block/parallels.c
@@ -438,6 +438,46 @@ static void parallels_check_unclean(BlockDriverState *bs,
      }
  }
+static int parallels_check_outside_image(BlockDriverState *bs,
+                                         BdrvCheckResult *res,
+                                         BdrvCheckMode fix)
+{
+    BDRVParallelsState *s = bs->opaque;
+    uint32_t i;
+    int64_t off, size;
+
+    size = bdrv_getlength(bs->file->bs);
+    if (size < 0) {
+        res->check_errors++;
+        return size;
+    }
+
+    for (i = 0; i < s->bat_size; i++) {
+        off = bat2sect(s, i) << BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
+        if (off > size) {
+            fprintf(stderr, "%s cluster %u is outside image\n",
+                    fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS ? "Repairing" : "ERROR", i);
+            res->corruptions++;
+            if (fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS) {
+                parallels_set_bat_entry(s, i, 0);
+                res->corruptions_fixed++;
+            }
+        }
+    }
+
+    /*
+     * If there were an out-of-image cluster it would be repaired,
+     * but s->data_end still would point outside image.
+     * Fix s->data_end by the file size.
+     */
+    size >>= BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
+    if (s->data_end > size) {
+        s->data_end = size;
+    }
and this is incorrect IMHO. In the next patch you could truncate the file
inside leak check and thus data_end will point to a wrong too lengthy
value.


+
+    return 0;
+}
+
  static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
                                             BdrvCheckResult *res,
                                             BdrvCheckMode fix)
@@ -457,6 +497,11 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
parallels_check_unclean(bs, res, fix); + ret = parallels_check_outside_image(bs, res, fix);
+    if (ret < 0) {
+        goto out;
+    }
+
      res->bfi.total_clusters = s->bat_size;
      res->bfi.compressed_clusters = 0; /* compression is not supported */
@@ -469,19 +514,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
              continue;
          }
- /* cluster outside the image */
-        if (off > size) {
-            fprintf(stderr, "%s cluster %u is outside image\n",
-                    fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS ? "Repairing" : "ERROR", i);
-            res->corruptions++;
-            if (fix & BDRV_FIX_ERRORS) {
-                prev_off = 0;
-                parallels_set_bat_entry(s, i, 0);
-                res->corruptions_fixed++;
-                continue;
-            }
-        }
-
          res->bfi.allocated_clusters++;
          if (off > high_off) {
              high_off = off;
@@ -518,15 +550,6 @@ static int coroutine_fn 
parallels_co_check(BlockDriverState *bs,
              res->leaks_fixed += count;
          }
      }
-    /*
-     * If there were an out-of-image cluster it would be repaired,
-     * but s->data_end still would point outside image.
-     * Fix s->data_end by the file size.
-     */
-    size >>= BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
-    if (s->data_end > size) {
-        s->data_end = size;
-    }
  out:
      qemu_co_mutex_unlock(&s->lock);




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]