Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct

qemu-devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct_setu

From:	Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Subject:	Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct_setup()
Date:	Tue, 23 Aug 2022 19:40:18 +0300
User-agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1

On 8/23/22 12:57, Denis V. Lunev wrote:

We would have one more place for block_acct_setup() calling, which should
not corrupt original value.

Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev<den@openvz.org>
CC: Peter Krempa<pkrempa@redhat.com>
CC: Markus Armbruster<armbru@redhat.com>
CC: John Snow<jsnow@redhat.com>
CC: Kevin Wolf<kwolf@redhat.com>
CC: Hanna Reitz<hreitz@redhat.com>
CC: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy<vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>


Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>

--
Best regards,
Vladimir

[Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread]

[PATCH v4 0/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure, Denis V. Lunev, 2022/08/23
- [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct_setup(), Denis V. Lunev, 2022/08/23
  - Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct_setup(), Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <=
- [PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure, Denis V. Lunev, 2022/08/23
  - Re: [PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy, 2022/08/23

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v8 02/12] s390x/cpu_topology: CPU topology objects and structures
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] hw/nvme: Abort copy command when format is one while pif is zero
Previous by thread: [PATCH 1/2] block: pass OnOffAuto instead of bool to block_acct_setup()
Next by thread: [PATCH 2/2] block: add missed block_acct_setup with new block device init procedure
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread