[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255
From: |
Igor Mammedov |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255 |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2022 09:57:09 +0200 |
On Sun, 31 Jul 2022 18:21:40 +0200
Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com> wrote:
> The new test is run with a large number of cpus and checks if the
> core_count field in smbios_cpu_test (structure type 4) is correct.
>
> Choose q35 as it allows to run with -smp > 255.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Suvorova <jusual@redhat.com>
pls, run checkpatch on patches and fix up whatever it complains about
before posting
> ---
> tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> index e352d5249f..cebfa430ac 100644
> --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test.c
> @@ -92,6 +92,8 @@ typedef struct {
> SmbiosEntryPoint smbios_ep_table;
> uint16_t smbios_cpu_max_speed;
> uint16_t smbios_cpu_curr_speed;
> + uint8_t smbios_core_count;
> + uint16_t smbios_core_count2;
> uint8_t *required_struct_types;
> int required_struct_types_len;
> QTestState *qts;
> @@ -631,29 +633,38 @@ static inline bool smbios_single_instance(uint8_t type)
> }
> }
>
> -static bool smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> +static void smbios_cpu_test(test_data *data, uint32_t addr)
> {
> - uint16_t expect_speed[2];
> - uint16_t real;
> + uint8_t core_count, expected_core_count = data->smbios_core_count;
> + uint16_t speed, core_count2, expected_core_count2 =
> data->smbios_core_count2;
> + uint16_t expected_speed[2];
> int offset[2];
> int i;
>
> /* Check CPU speed for backward compatibility */
> offset[0] = offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, max_speed);
> offset[1] = offsetof(struct smbios_type_4, current_speed);
> - expect_speed[0] = data->smbios_cpu_max_speed ? : 2000;
> - expect_speed[1] = data->smbios_cpu_curr_speed ? : 2000;
> + expected_speed[0] = data->smbios_cpu_max_speed ? : 2000;
> + expected_speed[1] = data->smbios_cpu_curr_speed ? : 2000;
>
> for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> - real = qtest_readw(data->qts, addr + offset[i]);
> - if (real != expect_speed[i]) {
> - fprintf(stderr, "Unexpected SMBIOS CPU speed: real %u expect
> %u\n",
> - real, expect_speed[i]);
> - return false;
> - }
> + speed = qtest_readw(data->qts, addr + offset[i]);
> + g_assert_cmpuint(speed, ==, expected_speed[i]);
> }
>
> - return true;
> + core_count = qtest_readb(data->qts,
> + addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4,
> core_count));
> + core_count2 = qtest_readw(data->qts,
> + addr + offsetof(struct smbios_type_4,
> core_count2));
it doesn't really matter here, that we read bogus core_count2 in case of v2
tables,
but to be cleaner I'd move reads above below respective 'if's
> + if (expected_core_count) {
> + g_assert_cmpuint(core_count, ==, expected_core_count);
> + }
> +
> + /* Core Count has reached its limit, checking Core Count 2 */
> + if (expected_core_count == 0xFF && expected_core_count2) {
> + g_assert_cmpuint(core_count2, ==, expected_core_count2);
> + }
> }
>
> static void test_smbios_structs(test_data *data, SmbiosEntryPointType
> ep_type)
> @@ -686,7 +697,7 @@ static void test_smbios_structs(test_data *data,
> SmbiosEntryPointType ep_type)
> set_bit(type, struct_bitmap);
>
> if (type == 4) {
> - g_assert(smbios_cpu_test(data, addr));
> + smbios_cpu_test(data, addr);
> }
>
> /* seek to end of unformatted string area of this struct ("\0\0") */
> @@ -903,6 +914,21 @@ static void test_acpi_q35_tcg(void)
> free_test_data(&data);
> }
>
> +static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2(void)
> +{
> + test_data data = {
> + .machine = MACHINE_Q35,
> + .variant = ".core-count2",
> + .required_struct_types = base_required_struct_types,
> + .required_struct_types_len = ARRAY_SIZE(base_required_struct_types),
> + .smbios_core_count = 0xFF,
> + .smbios_core_count2 = 275,
> + };
> +
> + test_acpi_one("-machine smbios-entry-point-type=64 -smp 275", &data);
> + free_test_data(&data);
> +}
> +
> static void test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge(void)
> {
> test_data data;
> @@ -1822,6 +1848,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> qtest_add_func("acpi/piix4/pci-hotplug/off",
> test_acpi_piix4_no_acpi_pci_hotplug);
> qtest_add_func("acpi/q35", test_acpi_q35_tcg);
> + qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/core-count2",
> test_acpi_q35_tcg_core_count2);
shouldn't we have a test for #cpus < 256 as well?
> qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/bridge", test_acpi_q35_tcg_bridge);
> qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/multif-bridge",
> test_acpi_q35_multif_bridge);
> qtest_add_func("acpi/q35/mmio64", test_acpi_q35_tcg_mmio64);
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] bios-tables-test: add test for number of cores > 255,
Igor Mammedov <=