qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] hw/isa/vt82c686: Instantiate USB functions in host


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] hw/isa/vt82c686: Instantiate USB functions in host device
Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:02:15 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, BB wrote:
Am 31. August 2022 17:03:35 MESZ schrieb BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, BB wrote:
Am 31. August 2022 15:23:37 MESZ schrieb BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>:
On Wed, 31 Aug 2022, Bernhard Beschow wrote:
The USB functions can be enabled/disabled through the ISA function. Also
its interrupt routing can be influenced there.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard Beschow <shentey@gmail.com>
---
hw/isa/vt82c686.c   | 12 ++++++++++++
hw/mips/fuloong2e.c |  3 ---
hw/ppc/pegasos2.c   |  4 ----
3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/isa/vt82c686.c b/hw/isa/vt82c686.c
index 9d946cea54..66a4b9c230 100644
--- a/hw/isa/vt82c686.c
+++ b/hw/isa/vt82c686.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include "hw/intc/i8259.h"
#include "hw/irq.h"
#include "hw/dma/i8257.h"
+#include "hw/usb/hcd-uhci.h"
#include "hw/timer/i8254.h"
#include "hw/rtc/mc146818rtc.h"
#include "migration/vmstate.h"
@@ -546,6 +547,7 @@ struct ViaISAState {
    qemu_irq *isa_irqs;
    ViaSuperIOState via_sio;
    PCIIDEState ide;
+    UHCIState uhci[2];
};

static const VMStateDescription vmstate_via = {
@@ -563,6 +565,8 @@ static void via_isa_init(Object *obj)
    ViaISAState *s = VIA_ISA(obj);

    object_initialize_child(obj, "ide", &s->ide, "via-ide");
+    object_initialize_child(obj, "uhci1", &s->uhci[0], "vt82c686b-usb-uhci");
+    object_initialize_child(obj, "uhci2", &s->uhci[1], "vt82c686b-usb-uhci");

Sorry for not saying this yesterday, this can also be done separately so no 
need for another version of this series if not needed for another reason but 
could we add a define for vt82c686b-usb-uhci in include/hw/isa/vt82c686.h and 
use that here and in hw/usb/vt82c686-uhci-pci.c ?

Would creating a dedicated header work, too? Board code doesn't need to see the 
define any longer.

I don't think it needs a separate header just for this so I'd put it in 
vt82c686.h but I don't mind either way.

Alright, I'll take the easy route for now. Splitting in dedicated headers (also 
for the other devices) could be done in a separate series.

I'll do this for via-ac97 when rabasing my WIP patch:

https://osdn.net/projects/qmiga/scm/git/qemu/commits

as I'll need to move ViaAC97State there too for embedding in ViaISAState. The other ones can stay in vt82c686.h I think.

(The reason this is still WIP is that it does not work and I'm not sure why, Maybe I need to test with a Linux guest to find out more but I haven't got to that yet.)

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]