|
From: | Thomas Huth |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 1/2] hw/vfio/migration: Remove unused 'exec/ram_addr.h' header |
Date: | Wed, 1 Mar 2023 20:32:12 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.13.0 |
On 27/02/2023 17.04, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 at 15:46, Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com> wrote:On Mon, 27 Feb 2023 11:32:57 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org> wrote:Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>Empty commit logs are a pet peeve of mine, there must be some sort of motivation for the change, something that changed to make this possible, or perhaps why this was never necessary. Thanks,I generally agree, but "this file doesn't actually need to include this header" seems straightforward enough that the commit subject says everything you'd want to say about it.
But not giving any description at all is really just bad style, we should avoid it. And in this case, there is even a good reason that should be mentioned here (e.g. "This header was the only reason this file needed to be built per target"). So I think it's fair to ask for a proper commit log message here.
Thomas
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |