On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:45:00AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 02.03.23 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:28:44AM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
On 02.03.23 00:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 09:03:51PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
To be used in further patch to identify the device hot-plugged into
pcie-root-port.
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy<vsementsov@yandex-team.ru>
Reviewed-by: Anton Kuchin<antonkuchin@yandex-team.ru>
Wait a second does this work for multifunction devices correctly?
I thought about that and I'm just lost:)
Could several (multifunction?) devices be plugged into one pcie-root-port
device?
One device per port but one multifunction device is represented as multiple
PCIDevice structures.
So, it should be OK to send _one_ event for that multifunction device, and the code is
shpc_reset() is OK, but reporting "Several child devices found" is bad idea?
I don't know about your new event, we are discussing it separately.
yes all functions are removed together normally on real hardware.
So, if I change the logic from pci_find_the_only_child() to
pci_find_first_child() is it OK?
Yes though I don't like this name either - need to make it clear that
multifunction is ok, multiple unrelated devices aren't.