qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 12/25] target/m68k: Reject immediate as destination in gen


From: Laurent Vivier
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/25] target/m68k: Reject immediate as destination in gen_ea_mode
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2023 13:32:48 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.8.0

Le 07/03/2023 à 19:34, Richard Henderson a écrit :
In theory this should never happen, as all such instructions
are illegal.  This is checked in e.g. gen_lea_mode and
gen_ea_mode_fp but not here.  In case something higher up
isn't checking modes properly, return NULL_QREG.  This will
result in an illegal instruction exception being raised.

NULL_QREG generates an address exception, not illegal instruction.


Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
---
Cc: Laurent Vivier <laurent@vivier.eu>
---
  target/m68k/translate.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/m68k/translate.c b/target/m68k/translate.c
index 44c3ac0bc3..fc65dad190 100644
--- a/target/m68k/translate.c
+++ b/target/m68k/translate.c
@@ -894,6 +894,10 @@ static TCGv gen_ea_mode(CPUM68KState *env, DisasContext 
*s, int mode, int reg0,
          case 3: /* pc index+displacement.  */
              goto do_indirect;
          case 4: /* Immediate.  */
+            /* Should never be used for an output or RMW input. */
+            if (what == EA_STORE || addrp) {

Why do you check addrp?

What happens for an instruction that provides addrp to SRC_EA() when it is used 
with immediate mode?
In this case addrp is unused, but it should not trigger an exception.

Thanks,
Laurent
+                return NULL_QREG;
+            }
              /* Sign extend values for consistency.  */
              switch (opsize) {
              case OS_BYTE:




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]