qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] hw/ipmi: Refactor IPMI interface


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] hw/ipmi: Refactor IPMI interface
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:34:03 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.0

Hello Hao,

On 3/25/23 00:09, Hao Wu wrote:
This patch refactors the IPMI interface so that it can be used by both
the BMC side and core-side simulation.

Detail changes:
(1) Split IPMIInterface into IPMIInterfaceHost (for host side
     simulation) and IPMIInterfaceClient (for BMC side simulation).
(2) rename handle_rsp -> handle_msg so the name fits both BMC side and
     Core side.
(3) Add a new class IPMICore. This class represents a simulator/external
     connection for both BMC and Core side emulation.
(4) Change the original IPMIBmc to IPMIBmcHost, representing host side
     simulation.
(5) Add a new type IPMIBmcClient representing BMC side simulation.
(6) Appy the changes to  the entire IPMI library.

'IPMIBmcHost' is a BMC object model (internal or external) and
'IPMIBmcClient' is a host object model ?

[ ... ]

@@ -267,15 +267,15 @@ void pnv_bmc_set_pnor(IPMIBmc *bmc, PnvPnor *pnor)
   * Instantiate the machine BMC. PowerNV uses the QEMU internal
   * simulator but it could also be external.
   */
-IPMIBmc *pnv_bmc_create(PnvPnor *pnor)
+IPMIBmcHost *pnv_bmc_create(PnvPnor *pnor)
  {
      Object *obj;
obj = object_new(TYPE_IPMI_BMC_SIMULATOR);
      qdev_realize(DEVICE(obj), NULL, &error_fatal);
-    pnv_bmc_set_pnor(IPMI_BMC(obj), pnor);
+    pnv_bmc_set_pnor(IPMI_BMC_HOST(obj), pnor);
- return IPMI_BMC(obj);
+    return IPMI_BMC_HOST(obj);

QEMU PowerNV machines model the host side of OpenPOWER systems which
have an Aspeed SoC based BMC for management. The routine above creates
an Aspeed *BMC* object model for the PowerNV *host* machine. I find
'IPMIBmcHost' confusing. It shouldn't have a 'Host' suffix I think.

'IPMIBmcClient' sounds ok, or 'IPMIBmcPeer' maybe.

Thanks,

C.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]