|
From: | Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH 2/2] tests/avocado/boot_linux.py: re-enable test-case for ppc64 |
Date: | Fri, 31 Mar 2023 13:19:18 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.9.1 |
Hello, [ Copying qemu-ppc@ and Daniel ] On 3/28/23 13:24, Kautuk Consul wrote:
On 2023-03-27 17:07:30, Alex Bennée wrote:Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:Fixes c0c8687ef0("tests/avocado: disable BootLinuxPPC64 test in CI"). Commit c0c8687ef0fd990db8db1655a8a6c5a5e35dd4bb disabled the test-case for PPC64. On investigation, this turns out to be an issue with the time taken for downloading the Fedora 31 qcow2 image being included within the test-case timeout. Re-enable this test-case by setting the timeout to 360 seconds just before launching the downloaded VM image. Signed-off-by: Kautuk Consul <kconsul@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reported-by: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org> Tested-by: Hariharan T S hariharan.ts@linux.vnet.ibm.comIt doesn't really address the principle problem that the boot_linux.py:BootLinuxPPC64.test_pseries_tcg is super heavyweight for only 2% extra coverage of the executed lines.By re-enabling this test-case we will ensure that PPC64 part of qemu works okay in terms of basic linux boot. Without this we will have a regression in the sense that there won't be any way to test out basic linux boot for PPC64.
There are ways and pseries is not only PPC64 machine. There is more to it. See : https://github.com/legoater/qemu-ppc-boot/tree/main/buildroot https://github.com/legoater/buildroot/tree/qemu-ppc/board/qemu QEMU PPC maintainers have external tools for regressions which are run regularly, at least before sending a PR for upstream. Thanks, C.
What we really need is a script so we can compare the output between the two jsons: gcovr --json --exclude-unreachable-branches --print-summary -o coverage.json --root ../../ . *.p because I suspect we could make up that missing few % noodling the baseline test a bit more.Can you tell me how you check code coverage with and without this test-case ? I am kind of new to qemu so it would be nice to know how you do this. And I am trying to increase the code coverage by improving the baseline test by including more devices in the qemu-system-ppc64 command line so I would appreciate any tips on how to do that also.--- tests/avocado/boot_linux.py | 6 +++++- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py b/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py index be30dcbd58..c3869a987c 100644 --- a/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py +++ b/tests/avocado/boot_linux.py @@ -91,9 +91,9 @@ class BootLinuxPPC64(LinuxTest): :avocado: tags=arch:ppc64 """+ # timeout for downloading new VM image.timeout = 360- @skipIf(os.getenv('GITLAB_CI'), 'Running on GitLab')def test_pseries_tcg(self): """ :avocado: tags=machine:pseries @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ def test_pseries_tcg(self): """ self.require_accelerator("tcg") self.vm.add_args("-accel", "tcg") + + # timeout for actual Linux PPC boot test + self.timeout = 360 + self.launch_and_wait(set_up_ssh_connection=False)-- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |