qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v6 14/25] ppc440_sdram: Move RAM size check to ppc440_sdram_i


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/25] ppc440_sdram: Move RAM size check to ppc440_sdram_init
Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 13:40:23 +0200 (CEST)

On Sat, 15 Oct 2022, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
On 10/14/22 19:52, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
On Fri, 14 Oct 2022, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
Zoltan,

Gitlab didn't like this patch. It broke all 32 bits builds due to an overflow
down there:

On 9/24/22 09:28, BALATON Zoltan wrote:
Move the check for valid memory sizes from board to sdram controller
init. This adds the missing valid memory sizes of 4 GiB, 16 and 8 MiB
to the DoC and the board now only checks for additional restrictions
imposed by its firmware then sdram init checks for valid sizes for SoC.

Signed-off-by: BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu>
---
  hw/ppc/ppc440.h    |  4 ++--
  hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c | 15 +++++++--------
  hw/ppc/sam460ex.c  | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
  3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc440.h b/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
index 01d76b8000..29f6f14ed7 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc440.h
@@ -11,13 +11,13 @@
  #ifndef PPC440_H
  #define PPC440_H
  -#include "hw/ppc/ppc4xx.h"
+#include "hw/ppc/ppc.h"
    void ppc4xx_l2sram_init(CPUPPCState *env);
  void ppc4xx_cpr_init(CPUPPCState *env);
  void ppc4xx_sdr_init(CPUPPCState *env);
  void ppc440_sdram_init(CPUPPCState *env, int nbanks,
-                       Ppc4xxSdramBank *ram_banks);
+                       MemoryRegion *ram);
  void ppc4xx_ahb_init(CPUPPCState *env);
  void ppc4xx_dma_init(CPUPPCState *env, int dcr_base);
  void ppc460ex_pcie_init(CPUPPCState *env);
diff --git a/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c b/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
index edd0781eb7..2b9d666b71 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@ void ppc4xx_sdr_init(CPUPPCState *env)
  typedef struct ppc440_sdram_t {
      uint32_t addr;
      uint32_t mcopt2;
-    int nbanks;
+    int nbanks; /* Banks to use from the 4, e.g. when board has less slots */
      Ppc4xxSdramBank bank[4];
  } ppc440_sdram_t;
  @@ -733,18 +733,17 @@ static void sdram_ddr2_reset(void *opaque)
  }
    void ppc440_sdram_init(CPUPPCState *env, int nbanks,
-                       Ppc4xxSdramBank *ram_banks)
+                       MemoryRegion *ram)
  {
      ppc440_sdram_t *s;
-    int i;
+    const ram_addr_t valid_bank_sizes[] = {
+        4 * GiB, 2 * GiB, 1 * GiB, 512 * MiB, 256 * MiB, 128 * MiB, 64 * MiB,


^ here. ram_addr_t will be a 32 bit var in a 32 bit host, and assigning 4 * GiB will
overflow it back to zero.

Here's the Gitlab error from the 'cross-win32-system' runner:

FAILED: libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj
2725i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -m32 -Ilibqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p -I. -I.. -Itarget/ppc -I../target/ppc -I../dtc/libfdt -Iqapi -Itrace -Iui -Iui/shader -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/glib-2.0 -I/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/lib/glib-2.0/include -fdiagnostics-color=auto -Wall -Winvalid-pch -Werror -std=gnu11 -O2 -g -iquote . -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu/include -iquote /builds/danielhb/qemu/tcg/i386 -mms-bitfields -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fno-pie -no-pie -D_GNU_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -Wstrict-prototypes -Wredundant-decls -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wmissing-prototypes -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -fwrapv -Wold-style-declaration -Wold-style-definition -Wtype-limits -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Winit-self -Wignored-qualifiers -Wempty-body -Wnested-externs -Wendif-labels -Wexpansion-to-defined -Wimplicit-fallthrough=2 -Wno-missing-include-dirs -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-psabi -fstack-protector-strong -DNEED_CPU_H '-DCONFIG_TARGET="ppc64-softmmu-config-target.h"' '-DCONFIG_DEVICES="ppc64-softmmu-config-devices.h"' -MD -MQ libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj -MF libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj.d -o libqemu-ppc64-softmmu.fa.p/hw_ppc_ppc440_uc.c.obj -c ../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c
2726../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c: In function 'ppc4xx_sdram_ddr2_realize':
2727../hw/ppc/ppc440_uc.c:729:9: error: unsigned conversion from 'long long int' to 'unsigned int' changes value from '4294967296' to '0' [-Werror=overflow] 2728  729 |         4 * GiB, 2 * GiB, 1 * GiB, 512 * MiB, 256 * MiB, 128 * MiB, 64 * MiB,
2729      |         ^
2730cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
2731

A quick fix that I can make in-tree is to avoid the overflow by doing (4 * GiB) - 1. But since this might affect some logic in the model I figured I should ask you
first.

I think in that case we can just drop the 4*GiB value from the valid_bank_sizes[] array for now because while it's valid for the SoC the sam460ex firmware also has problems with it so having 2 GiB as largest value is OK.

Got it.

Can you change the patch accordingly or should I send an updated version with this change?

I'll fix it in-tree, no need to re-send. I'll also amend the commit msg
accordingly.

Thank you for taking care of it.

Do you want a TODO marker in that line mentioning that we're pending
support for the 4GiB value?

Up to you, maybe does not need to be TODO just a comment saying

/* SoC also has 4 GiB but that causes problem with 32 bit build */

or something like that which is enough to remind why it's missing.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]