[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 7/7] tcg/ppc: Use prefixed instructions for tcg_out_goto_tb
From: |
Nicholas Piggin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 7/7] tcg/ppc: Use prefixed instructions for tcg_out_goto_tb |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Aug 2023 19:38:08 +1000 |
On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 5:29 PM AEST, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> On Mon Aug 7, 2023 at 12:13 AM AEST, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > On 8/6/23 05:55, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
> > > On Sat Aug 5, 2023 at 7:33 AM AEST, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > >> When a direct branch is out of range, we can load the destination for
> > >> the indirect branch using PLA (for 16GB worth of buffer) and PLD from
> > >> the TranslationBlock for everything larger.
> > >>
> > >> This means the patch affects exactly one instruction: B (plus filler),
> > >> PLA or PLD. Which means we can update and execute the patch atomically.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
> > >> ---
> > >> tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc | 76 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> > >> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
> > >> index 5b243b2353..47c71bb5f2 100644
> > >> --- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
> > >> +++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
> > >> @@ -2642,31 +2642,41 @@ static void tcg_out_goto_tb(TCGContext *s, int
> > >> which)
> > >> uintptr_t ptr = get_jmp_target_addr(s, which);
> > >>
> > >> if (USE_REG_TB) {
> > >> + /*
> > >> + * With REG_TB, we must always use indirect branching,
> > >> + * so that the branch destination and TCG_REG_TB match.
> > >> + */
> > >> ptrdiff_t offset = tcg_tbrel_diff(s, (void *)ptr);
> > >> tcg_out_mem_long(s, LD, LDX, TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB, offset);
> > >> -
> > >> - /* TODO: Use direct branches when possible. */
> > >> - set_jmp_insn_offset(s, which);
> > >> tcg_out32(s, MTSPR | RS(TCG_REG_TB) | CTR);
> > >> -
> > >> tcg_out32(s, BCCTR | BO_ALWAYS);
> > >>
> > >> /* For the unlinked case, need to reset TCG_REG_TB. */
> > >> set_jmp_reset_offset(s, which);
> > >> tcg_out_mem_long(s, ADDI, ADD, TCG_REG_TB, TCG_REG_TB,
> > >> -tcg_current_code_size(s));
> > >> + return;
> > >> + }
> > >> +
> > >> + if (have_isa_3_10) {
> > >> + /* Align, so that we can patch 8 bytes atomically. */
> > >> + if ((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 7) {
> > >> + tcg_out32(s, NOP);
> > >> + }
> > >> + set_jmp_insn_offset(s, which);
> > >> + /* Direct branch will be patched by tb_target_set_jmp_target. */
> > >> + tcg_out_mls_d(s, ADDI, TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, 0, 1);
> > >> } else {
> > >> /* Direct branch will be patched by tb_target_set_jmp_target.
> > >> */
> > >> - set_jmp_insn_offset(s, which);
> > >> - tcg_out32(s, NOP);
> > >> -
> > >> + tcg_out32(s, B);
> > >> /* When branch is out of range, fall through to indirect. */
> > >> tcg_out_movi(s, TCG_TYPE_PTR, TCG_REG_TMP1, ptr -
> > >> (int16_t)ptr);
> > >> tcg_out_ld(s, TCG_TYPE_PTR, TCG_REG_TMP1, TCG_REG_TMP1,
> > >> (int16_t)ptr);
> > >> - tcg_out32(s, MTSPR | RS(TCG_REG_TMP1) | CTR);
> > >> - tcg_out32(s, BCCTR | BO_ALWAYS);
> > >> - set_jmp_reset_offset(s, which);
> > >> }
> > >> +
> > >> + tcg_out32(s, MTSPR | RS(TCG_REG_TMP1) | CTR);
> > >> + tcg_out32(s, BCCTR | BO_ALWAYS);
> > >> + set_jmp_reset_offset(s, which);
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> void tb_target_set_jmp_target(const TranslationBlock *tb, int n,
> > >> @@ -2674,20 +2684,50 @@ void tb_target_set_jmp_target(const
> > >> TranslationBlock *tb, int n,
> > >> {
> > >> uintptr_t addr = tb->jmp_target_addr[n];
> > >> intptr_t diff = addr - jmp_rx;
> > >> - tcg_insn_unit insn;
> > >>
> > >> if (USE_REG_TB) {
> > >> return;
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> - if (in_range_b(diff)) {
> > >> - insn = B | (diff & 0x3fffffc);
> > >> - } else {
> > >> - insn = NOP;
> > >> - }
> > >> + if (have_isa_3_10) {
> > >> + tcg_insn_unit insn1, insn2;
> > >> + uint64_t pair;
> > >>
> > >> - qatomic_set((uint32_t *)jmp_rw, insn);
> > >> - flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 4);
> > >> + if (in_range_b(diff)) {
> > >> + insn1 = B | (diff & 0x3fffffc);
> > >> + insn2 = NOP;
> > >> + } else if (diff == sextract64(diff, 0, 34)) {
> > >> + /* PLA tmp1, diff */
> > >> + insn1 = OPCD(1) | (2 << 24) | (1 << 20) | ((diff >> 16) &
> > >> 0x3ffff);
> > >> + insn2 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, diff);
> > >> + } else {
> > >> + addr = (uintptr_t)&tb->jmp_target_addr[n];
> > >> + diff = addr - jmp_rx;
> > >> + tcg_debug_assert(diff == sextract64(diff, 0, 34));
> > >> + /* PLD tmp1, diff */
> > >> + insn1 = OPCD(1) | (1 << 20) | ((diff >> 16) & 0x3ffff);
> > >> + insn2 = PLD | TAI(TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, diff);
> > >> + }
> > >
> > > B is a "patch class" word instruction as per CMODX in the ISA, which may
> > > be patched to/from other instructions without a flush+isync sequence
> > > betwen. So that part is okay, at least if you were just patching the B
> > > word. But patching between the PLA and PLD I don't think is kosher per
> > > ISA.
> > >
> > > I struggle a bit with this part of the ISA, particularly with prefix
> > > instructions (it only talks about patching 4 bytes at a time).
> > >
> > > If we patch something it has to go through a patch instruction, which
> > > is a direct branch, trap, or nop. I think that makes this non-trivial.
> > >
> > > It could work if you only patched between B and PLD. B->PLD would have
> > > to patch the suffix word first, possibly with an interleaving sync, and
> > > then the prefix. PLD->B could just patch the B word.
> > >
> > > How much would losing the PLA hurt?
> >
> > Really? I can't imagine how some icache would see a torn prefixed insn
> > given an atomic
> > store (CMODX talks about prefixed instructions which "may be unaligned" --
> > but what if
> > they are not?).
> >
> > But if patching an aligned prefixed insn isn't allowed, I would patch
> > between B and NOP,
> > leave the PLD alone on the fall-through path, and drop the PLA.
>
> Hmm, even patching two different offset B instructions in some sequence
> with a PLD would go against the ISA, because PLD is not a patch class
> instruction. The only case you can patch those has to have a sequence of
> exactly two instruction values. So I think you need the B first, and you
> can patch that between any offset of B or a NOP to fall through to PLD.
> NOP and B are both patch class, so any sequence of them is allowed.
Here is an incremental diff that hopefully solves those issues. Sadly,
by removing the nice PLA patching :( But it seems to be around or close
to original performance on my test.
Feel free to squash it in or take inspiration (or dispute it).
Thanks,
Nick
---
diff --git a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
index 47c71bb5f2..569c2e3647 100644
--- a/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
+++ b/tcg/ppc/tcg-target.c.inc
@@ -748,6 +748,11 @@ static void tcg_out_prefix_align(TCGContext *s)
}
}
+static ptrdiff_t tcg_pcrel_diff_for_prefix(TCGContext *s, const void *target)
+{
+ return tcg_pcrel_diff(s, target) - (tcg_out_need_prefix_align(s) ? 4 : 0);
+}
+
/* Output Type 00 Prefix - 8-Byte Load/Store Form (8LS:D) */
static void tcg_out_8ls_d(TCGContext *s, tcg_insn_unit opc, unsigned rt,
unsigned ra, tcg_target_long imm, bool r)
@@ -1072,8 +1077,7 @@ static void tcg_out_movi_int(TCGContext *s, TCGType type,
TCGReg ret,
return;
}
- tmp = tcg_out_need_prefix_align(s) * 4;
- tmp = tcg_pcrel_diff(s, (void *)arg) - tmp;
+ tmp = tcg_pcrel_diff_for_prefix(s, (void *)arg);
if (tmp == sextract64(tmp, 0, 34)) {
/* pla ret,value = paddi ret,0,value,1 */
tcg_out_mls_d(s, ADDI, ret, 0, tmp, 1);
@@ -2658,18 +2662,19 @@ static void tcg_out_goto_tb(TCGContext *s, int which)
return;
}
+ /* Direct branch will be patched by tb_target_set_jmp_target. */
+ set_jmp_insn_offset(s, which);
+ tcg_out32(s, NOP);
+
+ /* When branch is out of range, fall through to indirect. */
if (have_isa_3_10) {
- /* Align, so that we can patch 8 bytes atomically. */
- if ((uintptr_t)s->code_ptr & 7) {
- tcg_out32(s, NOP);
- }
- set_jmp_insn_offset(s, which);
- /* Direct branch will be patched by tb_target_set_jmp_target. */
- tcg_out_mls_d(s, ADDI, TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, 0, 1);
+ ptrdiff_t offset = tcg_pcrel_diff_for_prefix(s, (void *)ptr);
+ /*
+ * Would be nice to use PLA if offset is in range,
+ * but CMODX rules make that difficult.
+ */
+ tcg_out_8ls_d(s, PLD, TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, offset, 1);
} else {
- /* Direct branch will be patched by tb_target_set_jmp_target. */
- tcg_out32(s, B);
- /* When branch is out of range, fall through to indirect. */
tcg_out_movi(s, TCG_TYPE_PTR, TCG_REG_TMP1, ptr - (int16_t)ptr);
tcg_out_ld(s, TCG_TYPE_PTR, TCG_REG_TMP1, TCG_REG_TMP1, (int16_t)ptr);
}
@@ -2684,50 +2689,19 @@ void tb_target_set_jmp_target(const TranslationBlock
*tb, int n,
{
uintptr_t addr = tb->jmp_target_addr[n];
intptr_t diff = addr - jmp_rx;
+ tcg_insn_unit insn;
if (USE_REG_TB) {
return;
}
- if (have_isa_3_10) {
- tcg_insn_unit insn1, insn2;
- uint64_t pair;
-
- if (in_range_b(diff)) {
- insn1 = B | (diff & 0x3fffffc);
- insn2 = NOP;
- } else if (diff == sextract64(diff, 0, 34)) {
- /* PLA tmp1, diff */
- insn1 = OPCD(1) | (2 << 24) | (1 << 20) | ((diff >> 16) & 0x3ffff);
- insn2 = ADDI | TAI(TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, diff);
- } else {
- addr = (uintptr_t)&tb->jmp_target_addr[n];
- diff = addr - jmp_rx;
- tcg_debug_assert(diff == sextract64(diff, 0, 34));
- /* PLD tmp1, diff */
- insn1 = OPCD(1) | (1 << 20) | ((diff >> 16) & 0x3ffff);
- insn2 = PLD | TAI(TCG_REG_TMP1, 0, diff);
- }
-
- if (HOST_BIG_ENDIAN) {
- pair = ((uint64_t)insn1) << 32 | insn2;
- } else {
- pair = ((uint64_t)insn2) << 32 | insn1;
- }
-
- qatomic_set((uint64_t *)jmp_rw, pair);
- flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 8);
+ if (in_range_b(diff)) {
+ insn = B | (diff & 0x3fffffc);
} else {
- tcg_insn_unit insn;
-
- if (in_range_b(diff)) {
- insn = B | (diff & 0x3fffffc);
- } else {
- insn = NOP;
- }
- qatomic_set((uint32_t *)jmp_rw, insn);
- flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 4);
+ insn = NOP;
}
+ qatomic_set((uint32_t *)jmp_rw, insn);
+ flush_idcache_range(jmp_rx, jmp_rw, 4);
}
static void tcg_out_op(TCGContext *s, TCGOpcode opc,
[PATCH 5/7] tcg/ppc: Use prefixed instructions in tcg_out_dupi_vec, Richard Henderson, 2023/08/04
Re: [PATCH for-8.2 0/7] tcg/ppc: Support power10 prefixed instructions, Nicholas Piggin, 2023/08/06