qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/9] backends/hostmem-file: Add "rom" property to support VM templating with R/O files
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 15:29:47 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

On 22.08.23 15:27, Markus Armbruster wrote:
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> writes:

For now, "share=off,readonly=on" would always result in us opening the
file R/O and mmap'ing the opened file MAP_PRIVATE R/O -- effectively
turning it into ROM.

Especially for VM templating, "share=off" is a common use case. However,
that use case is impossible with files that lack write permissions,
because "share=off,readonly=on" will not give us writable RAM.

The sole user of ROM via memory-backend-file are R/O NVDIMMs, but as we
have users (Kata Containers) that rely on the existing behavior --
malicious VMs should not be able to consume COW memory for R/O NVDIMMs --
we cannot change the semantics of "share=off,readonly=on"

So let's add a new "rom" property with on/off/auto values. "auto" is
the default and what most people will use: for historical reasons, to not
change the old semantics, it defaults to the value of the "readonly"
property.

For VM templating, one can now use:
     -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=on,rom=off,...

But we'll disallow:
     -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=on,rom=off,...
because we would otherwise get an error when trying to mmap the R/O file
shared and writable. An explicit error message is cleaner.

We will also disallow for now:
     -object memory-backend-file,share=off,readonly=off,rom=on,...
     -object memory-backend-file,share=on,readonly=off,rom=on,...
It's not harmful, but also not really required for now.

Alternatives that were abandoned:
* Make "unarmed=on" for the NVDIMM set the memory region container
   readonly. We would still see a change of ROM->RAM and possibly run
   into memslot limits with vhost-user. Further, there might be use cases
   for "unarmed=on" that should still allow writing to that memory
   (temporary files, system RAM, ...).
* Add a new "readonly=on/off/auto" parameter for NVDIMMs. Similar issues
   as with "unarmed=on".
* Make "readonly" consume "on/off/file" instead of being a 'bool' type.
   This would slightly changes the behavior of the "readonly" parameter:
   values like true/false (as accepted by a 'bool'type) would no longer be
   accepted.

Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>

[...]

  static void file_backend_instance_finalize(Object *o)
diff --git a/qapi/qom.json b/qapi/qom.json
index fa3e88c8e6..0cf83c6f39 100644
--- a/qapi/qom.json
+++ b/qapi/qom.json
@@ -668,6 +668,9 @@
  # @readonly: if true, the backing file is opened read-only; if false,
  #     it is opened read-write.  (default: false)
  #
+# @rom: whether to create Read Only Memory (ROM).  If set to 'auto', it
+#       defaults to the value of @readonly.  (default: auto, since 8.2)
+#
  # Since: 2.1
  ##

The commit message discusses how @readonly, @rom and @share interact.
The doc comments don't, and users have to guess.

I can see two ways to help users:

1. Describe their interaction in full, so users can understand how to
get from them what they need.

2. Provide suitable guidance on how to use them.

  { 'struct': 'MemoryBackendFileProperties',
@@ -677,7 +680,8 @@
              '*discard-data': 'bool',
              'mem-path': 'str',
              '*pmem': { 'type': 'bool', 'if': 'CONFIG_LIBPMEM' },
-            '*readonly': 'bool' } }
+            '*readonly': 'bool',
+            '*rom': 'OnOffAuto' } }
  ##
  # @MemoryBackendMemfdProperties:
diff --git a/qemu-options.hx b/qemu-options.hx
index 29b98c3d4c..03ce0b0a30 100644
--- a/qemu-options.hx
+++ b/qemu-options.hx
@@ -4976,7 +4976,7 @@ SRST
      they are specified. Note that the 'id' property must be set. These
      objects are placed in the '/objects' path.
- ``-object memory-backend-file,id=id,size=size,mem-path=dir,share=on|off,discard-data=on|off,merge=on|off,dump=on|off,prealloc=on|off,host-nodes=host-nodes,policy=default|preferred|bind|interleave,align=align,offset=offset,readonly=on|off``
+    ``-object 
memory-backend-file,id=id,size=size,mem-path=dir,share=on|off,discard-data=on|off,merge=on|off,dump=on|off,prealloc=on|off,host-nodes=host-nodes,policy=default|preferred|bind|interleave,align=align,offset=offset,readonly=on|off,rom=on|off|auto``
          Creates a memory file backend object, which can be used to back
          the guest RAM with huge pages.
@@ -5066,6 +5066,14 @@ SRST
          The ``readonly`` option specifies whether the backing file is opened
          read-only or read-write (default).
+ The ``rom`` option specifies whether to create Read Only Memory (ROM)
+        that cannot be modified by the VM. If set to ``on``, the VM cannot
+        modify the memory. If set to ``off``, the VM can modify the memory.
+        If set to ``auto`` (default), the value of the ``readonly`` property
+        is used. This option is primarily helpful for VM templating, where we
+        want to open a file readonly (``readonly=on``) and allow private
+        modifications of the memory by the VM (``share=off``, ``rom=off``).
+

Here, you provide some guidance.

Is that sufficient in your opinion? Then I could similarly replicate (unfortunately) it in the qapi/qom.json doc?

Thanks Markus!

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]