qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH for-8.2 0/6] ppc: debug facility improvements


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH for-8.2 0/6] ppc: debug facility improvements
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2023 18:43:24 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.13.0

Hello,

On 8/8/23 05:11, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
I started out looking at this to reduce divergence of TCG and KVM
machines with 2nd DAWR. The divergence already exists with first
DAWR, so I don't want to tie the KVM 2nd DAWR enablement to this,
but it would be nice to ensure the caps and such for the 2nd DAWR
will also work for TCG.

I don't know that we have great test cases for this, it does work
with some of the Linux selftests ptrace debug tests (although those
tests seem to have a few issues in upstream kernels), some basic
Linux xmon and gdb tests by hand, and I've started working on some
kvm unit tests.

Thanks,
Nick

Nicholas Piggin (6):
   target/ppc: Remove single-step suppression inside 0x100-0xf00
   target/ppc: Improve book3s branch trace interrupt for v2.07S
   target/ppc: Suppress single step interrupts on rfi-type instructions
   target/ppc: Implement breakpoint debug facility for v2.07S
   target/ppc: Implement watchpoint debug facility for v2.07S
   spapr: implement H_SET_MODE debug facilities

  hw/ppc/spapr_hcall.c     |  57 +++++++++++++++++++++
  target/ppc/cpu.c         |  86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  target/ppc/cpu.h         |   7 +++
  target/ppc/cpu_init.c    |  11 ++--
  target/ppc/excp_helper.c | 108 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
  target/ppc/helper.h      |   4 ++
  target/ppc/internal.h    |   3 ++
  target/ppc/machine.c     |   5 ++
  target/ppc/misc_helper.c |  15 ++++++
  target/ppc/spr_common.h  |   3 ++
  target/ppc/translate.c   |  60 +++++++++++++++++-----
  11 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)


I am preparing a PR with this series. It is time to take a look at it if you
haven't already !


Thanks,

C.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]