qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] hw/sm501: allow compiling without PIXMAN


From: BALATON Zoltan
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/18] hw/sm501: allow compiling without PIXMAN
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2023 12:24:30 +0200 (CEST)

On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 2:09 PM BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu> wrote:

On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 1:53 PM BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu> wrote:
On Tue, 10 Oct 2023, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
Hi Zoltan

On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 9:59 PM BALATON Zoltan <balaton@eik.bme.hu> wrote:

On Mon, 18 Sep 2023, marcandre.lureau@redhat.com wrote:
From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>

Drop the "x-pixman" property and use fallback path in such case.

Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
---
hw/display/sm501.c | 19 ++++++++++++++++---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/display/sm501.c b/hw/display/sm501.c
index 0eecd00701..a897c82f04 100644
--- a/hw/display/sm501.c
+++ b/hw/display/sm501.c
@@ -730,7 +730,6 @@ static void sm501_2d_operation(SM501State *s)
    switch (cmd) {
    case 0: /* BitBlt */
    {
-        static uint32_t tmp_buf[16384];
        unsigned int src_x = (s->twoD_source >> 16) & 0x01FFF;
        unsigned int src_y = s->twoD_source & 0xFFFF;
        uint32_t src_base = s->twoD_source_base & 0x03FFFFFF;
@@ -828,9 +827,11 @@ static void sm501_2d_operation(SM501State *s)
                de = db + (width + (height - 1) * dst_pitch) * bypp;
                overlap = (db < se && sb < de);
            }
+#ifdef CONFIG_PIXMAN
            if (overlap && (s->use_pixman & BIT(2))) {
                /* pixman can't do reverse blit: copy via temporary */
                int tmp_stride = DIV_ROUND_UP(width * bypp, sizeof(uint32_t));
+                static uint32_t tmp_buf[16384];
                uint32_t *tmp = tmp_buf;

                if (tmp_stride * sizeof(uint32_t) * height > sizeof(tmp_buf)) {
@@ -860,9 +861,12 @@ static void sm501_2d_operation(SM501State *s)
                                       dst_pitch * bypp / sizeof(uint32_t),
                                       8 * bypp, 8 * bypp, src_x, src_y,
                                       dst_x, dst_y, width, height);
-            } else {
+            } else
+#else
+            {
                fallback = true;
            }
+#endif
            if (fallback) {
                uint8_t *sp = s->local_mem + src_base;
                uint8_t *d = s->local_mem + dst_base;
@@ -894,10 +898,13 @@ static void sm501_2d_operation(SM501State *s)
            color = cpu_to_le16(color);
        }

+#ifdef CONFIG_PIXMAN
        if (!(s->use_pixman & BIT(0)) || (width == 1 && height == 1) ||
            !pixman_fill((uint32_t *)&s->local_mem[dst_base],
                         dst_pitch * bypp / sizeof(uint32_t), 8 * bypp,
-                         dst_x, dst_y, width, height, color)) {
+                         dst_x, dst_y, width, height, color))
+#endif
+        {
            /* fallback when pixman failed or we don't want to call it */
            uint8_t *d = s->local_mem + dst_base;
            unsigned int x, y, i;
@@ -2038,7 +2045,9 @@ static void sm501_realize_sysbus(DeviceState *dev, Error 
**errp)

static Property sm501_sysbus_properties[] = {
    DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("vram-size", SM501SysBusState, vram_size, 0),
+#ifdef CONFIG_PIXMAN
    DEFINE_PROP_UINT8("x-pixman", SM501SysBusState, state.use_pixman, 7),
+#endif

Do we want to omit the property when compiled without pixman? I think we
could leave it there and it would just be ignored without pixman but the
same command line would still work and need less ifdefs in code.

That's a reasonable idea to me. At least, it can handle x-pixman=0
fine when !CONFIG_PIXMAN then.

Btw, looking at it, it seems it should be DEFINE_PROP_BIT instead. I
will add a TODO :)

Erm, a bit can be 1 or 0 but the default value of it is 7. It's not a
single but but a bitmask the enable/disable pisman for different
operations separately so I think it can't be _BIT.

Sure, but we could have more explicitly different BIT properties
("x-pixman-fill", "x-pixman-blit", "x-pixman-overlap-blit").

That was also proposed when I've added it and concluded that we don't want
that. This is a debug option for experts and adding a lot of experimental
options for that that are also harder to type is not an improvement so
having just a value is fine.

Ok, I'll change the comment to:
/* this a debug option, prefer UINT over PROP_BIT for simplicity */

r-b with that?

I don't think it needs a comment but I don't mind if you add one. I'll review the latest version later and if you add a comment that won't change it.

Regards,
BALATON Zoltan

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]