qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 05/11] testing/avocado: ppc add new BookE boot_linux_cons


From: Nicholas Piggin
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 05/11] testing/avocado: ppc add new BookE boot_linux_console.py tests
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 06:53:04 +1000

On Tue Oct 10, 2023 at 10:03 PM AEST, Joel Stanley wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Oct 2023 at 18:23, Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add simple Linux kernel boot tests for BookE 64-bit and 32-bit CPUs
> > using Guenter Roeck's rootfs images for Linux testing, and a gitlab
> > repository with kernel images that I built since there are very few
> > sources of modern BookE images now.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
>
> Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>
>
> Should we get mpe to add a https://github.com/linuxppc/qemu-ci-images
> for you to keep those kernel images? But perhaps you'd prefer to keep
> them on gitlab. Just a suggestion.

Not a bad idea. Or we could try for gitlab/qemu/ci-images I suppose.

>
> > ---
> >  tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py 
> > b/tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py
> > index 9434304cd3..dc3346ef49 100644
> > --- a/tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py
> > +++ b/tests/avocado/boot_linux_console.py
> > @@ -1355,6 +1355,59 @@ def test_ppc64_e500(self):
> >          tar_hash = '6951d86d644b302898da2fd701739c9406527fe1'
> >          self.do_test_advcal_2018('19', tar_hash, 'uImage')
> >
> > +    def test_ppc64_e6500(self):
> > +        """
> > +        :avocado: tags=arch:ppc64
> > +        :avocado: tags=machine:ppce500
> > +        :avocado: tags=cpu:e6500
> > +        :avocado: tags=accel:tcg
> > +        """
> > +        kernel_url = 
> > ('https://gitlab.com/npiggin/qemu-ci-images/-/raw/main/ppc/corenet64_vmlinux?ref_type=heads&inline=false')
>
> Is the ref_type?heads=inline-false required? I seem to get the file
> successfully with wget and those omitted.

I just copied the download link, so if it works without then
I'll remove it.

Thanks,
Nick



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]