Re: [PATCH 12/13] migration: Use vmstate_register_any() for eeprom93xx

[Stefan Berger]

On 10/19/23 15:08, Juan Quintela wrote:
> We can have more than one eeprom93xx.
> For instance:
>
> e100_nic_realize() -> eeprom93xx_new()
>
> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
> index 1081e2cc0d..57d63638d7 100644
> --- a/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
> +++ b/hw/nvram/eeprom93xx.c
> @@ -321,7 +321,7 @@ eeprom_t *eeprom93xx_new(DeviceState *dev, uint16_t nwords)
>       /* Output DO is tristate, read results in 1. */
>       eeprom->eedo = 1;
>       logout("eeprom = 0x%p, nwords = %u\n", eeprom, nwords);
> -    vmstate_register(VMSTATE_IF(dev), 0, &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
> +    vmstate_register_any(VMSTATE_IF(dev), &vmstate_eeprom, eeprom);
>       return eeprom;
>   }