qemu-ppc
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v4 22/41] vfio/spapr: switch to spapr IOMMU BE add/del_sectio


From: Cédric Le Goater
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/41] vfio/spapr: switch to spapr IOMMU BE add/del_section_window
Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2023 14:07:36 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

On 11/7/23 04:06, Duan, Zhenzhong wrote:


-----Original Message-----
From: Cédric Le Goater <clg@redhat.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 7, 2023 1:33 AM
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 22/41] vfio/spapr: switch to spapr IOMMU BE
add/del_section_window

On 11/2/23 08:12, Zhenzhong Duan wrote:
No fucntional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@intel.com>
---
   include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h         |  5 -----
   include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h |  5 +++++
   hw/vfio/common.c                      |  8 ++------
   hw/vfio/container-base.c              | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
   hw/vfio/spapr.c                       | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
   5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
index b9e5a0e64b..055f679363 100644
--- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
+++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-common.h
@@ -169,11 +169,6 @@ VFIOAddressSpace
*vfio_get_address_space(AddressSpace *as);
   void vfio_put_address_space(VFIOAddressSpace *space);

   /* SPAPR specific */
-int vfio_container_add_section_window(VFIOContainer *container,
-                                      MemoryRegionSection *section,
-                                      Error **errp);
-void vfio_container_del_section_window(VFIOContainer *container,
-                                       MemoryRegionSection *section);
   int vfio_spapr_container_init(VFIOContainer *container, Error **errp);
   void vfio_spapr_container_deinit(VFIOContainer *container);

diff --git a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-
container-base.h
index f62a14ac73..4b6f017c6f 100644
--- a/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
+++ b/include/hw/vfio/vfio-container-base.h
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ int vfio_container_dma_map(VFIOContainerBase
*bcontainer,
   int vfio_container_dma_unmap(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
                                hwaddr iova, ram_addr_t size,
                                IOMMUTLBEntry *iotlb);
+int vfio_container_add_section_window(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
+                                      MemoryRegionSection *section,
+                                      Error **errp);
+void vfio_container_del_section_window(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
+                                       MemoryRegionSection *section);
   int vfio_container_set_dirty_page_tracking(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
                                              bool start);
   int vfio_container_query_dirty_bitmap(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
diff --git a/hw/vfio/common.c b/hw/vfio/common.c
index 483ba82089..572ae7c934 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/common.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/common.c
@@ -571,8 +571,6 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener
*listener,
   {
       VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer = container_of(listener, VFIOContainerBase,
                                                    listener);
-    VFIOContainer *container = container_of(bcontainer, VFIOContainer,
-                                            bcontainer);
       hwaddr iova, end;
       Int128 llend, llsize;
       void *vaddr;
@@ -595,7 +593,7 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_add(MemoryListener
*listener,
           return;
       }

-    if (vfio_container_add_section_window(container, section, &err)) {
+    if (vfio_container_add_section_window(bcontainer, section, &err)) {
           goto fail;
       }

@@ -738,8 +736,6 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_del(MemoryListener
*listener,
   {
       VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer = container_of(listener, VFIOContainerBase,
                                                    listener);
-    VFIOContainer *container = container_of(bcontainer, VFIOContainer,
-                                            bcontainer);
       hwaddr iova, end;
       Int128 llend, llsize;
       int ret;
@@ -818,7 +814,7 @@ static void vfio_listener_region_del(MemoryListener
*listener,

       memory_region_unref(section->mr);

-    vfio_container_del_section_window(container, section);
+    vfio_container_del_section_window(bcontainer, section);
   }

   typedef struct VFIODirtyRanges {
diff --git a/hw/vfio/container-base.c b/hw/vfio/container-base.c
index 0177f43741..71f7274973 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/container-base.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/container-base.c
@@ -31,6 +31,27 @@ int vfio_container_dma_unmap(VFIOContainerBase
*bcontainer,
       return bcontainer->ops->dma_unmap(bcontainer, iova, size, iotlb);
   }

+int vfio_container_add_section_window(VFIOContainerBase *bcontainer,
+                                      MemoryRegionSection *section,
+                                      Error **errp)
+{
+    if (!bcontainer->ops->add_window) {
+        return 0;
+    }

These should an assert right ? because only called on the pseries
platform which defines the handlers.

Because we use a unified vfio_memory_listener for legacy, spapr and iommufd
backend, so we need the check for legacy and iommufd backend.

Another choice is to introduce separate region_add/del callbacks for spapr,
then we can add assert. But that way we will have redundant code.

Yeah. I thought so. I will take a look. I have more comments to come.

Thanks,

C.





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]